Marginal Abatement Cost Curves for Water Scarcity Mitigation under Uncertainty

Abstract

As water scarcity and drought become more common, planning to avoid their consequences becomes crucial. Measures to prevent the impact of new climate conditions are expected to be extensive, costly and associated with major uncertainties. It is therefore necessary that policymakers and practitioners in both the public and private sector can compare possible mitigation measures in order to make economically rational investment decisions. For this to be successful, decision-makers need relevant decision support. This paper presents a novel approach of constructing marginal abatement cost curves for comparing water scarcity mitigation measures while taking the underlying uncertainties into account. Uncertainties in input variables are represented by probability distributions and calculations are performed using Monte Carlo simulations. This approach is applied on the island of Gotland, one of the most water-stressed parts of Sweden, to provide the first marginal abatement cost curve in Europe for water scarcity mitigation in which municipal, agricultural, industrial and household measures are compared. The results show that the agricultural measure of on-farm storage has the greatest potential to increase water availability on the island. Among municipal measures, increased groundwater extraction and desalination offer the greatest potential, although desalination is almost 25 times more costly per cubic meter. The most cost-effective measure is linked to hot water savings in the hotel industry. The approach presented provides a quantitative visualization of the financial trade-offs and uncertainties implied by different mitigation measures. It provides critical economic insights for all parties concerned and is thus an important basis for decision-making.

Heading into the Unknown? Exploring Sustainable Drought Management in the Mediterranean Region

“…• The potential benefits: This is the most common aspect included in the current drought management plans, since it provides a convincing argument for stakeholders to support the policy proposal. • The risk and gain of sustainable drought management choices: [126] Conducting a risk-gain analysis enables water stakeholders to assess and contrast various drought management approaches, aiding in the identification of options that yield the highest benefit for their systems. While stakeholders comprehend the impact of drought on aspects such as water quality, quantity, and social and environmental demand, determining the risks and evaluating the relative advantages of diverse drought management practices poses a challenge.…”

Low-Carbon Urban Water Systems: Opportunities beyond Water and Wastewater Utilities?

“…Marginal abatement cost curve has become a popular policy tool in assessing and communicating the economics of climate change mitigation opportunities. , A growing body of research is exploring the use of this cost curve approach for supporting energy and GHG management in urban water systems ,− and water efficiency management. − In the applications of GHG emissions management, the approach visualizes the marginal abatement costs (net cost per unit of GHG emissions abated, e.g., €/ton CO 2 -eq) and abatement potentials (annual or total abatement potential, e.g., kton CO 2 -eq/year) of different opportunities and prioritizes opportunities based on their marginal abatement costs. The marginal abatement cost of an opportunity can be expressed as the annualized net cost over the annual abatement potential.…”

China's manufacturing firms' willingness to pay for carbon abatement: A cost perspective

“…There are several methods available for estimating the MAC. Sjöstrand et al (2019) estimated the MAC using the expert‐based approach. The top‐bottom economic model, like the computable general equilibrium (CGE) model, can also be used to measure the marginal abatement for macro individuals (Jiang et al, 2022; Tang et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2021).…”