Marginal benefit based optimal water allocation: case of Teesta River, Bangladesh

Abstract

This article describes a hydrologic-economic optimization model for allocating available river flow between competing off- and in-stream demands, based on the marginal benefits (MBs) of sectoral water uses in a segment of the Teesta River in Bangladesh. Irrigation, capture fishery and navigation are the main direct water uses considered. The value of irrigation water was estimated using the residual imputation method. Losses in yield caused by lowered irrigation supply, resulting from reduced river flow, formed the basis for establishing the total and MB functions for off-stream river water use (irrigation). Total and MB functions for in-stream water use (capture fishery, navigation) were developed using field survey data of beneficiaries' income as a function of river flow. Analysis was enhanced by applying AQUARIUS, which allocates water between users to maximize consumer surplus based on MB functions. Model results show that in-stream uses could not compete with off-stream uses in the case of the Teesta, as substantial benefit was obtained from irrigation. Environmental flow to safeguard river health and in-stream use was considered to be a constraint in the optimization, which results in a sizeable reduction in irrigation benefit with a small increase in in-stream benefit. The necessary trade-offs between economic efficiency and environmental protection are depicted, providing insight into a justifiable water allocation strategy for the Teesta. (Résumé d'auteur

Review of hydro-economic models to address river basin management problems: structure, applications and research gaps

“…A third domain of analysis using HEMs considers water use trade-offs between agricultural production and environmental systems (Mullick et al 2013;Cai et al 2003b;Cai et al 2002;Gutižrrez et al 2013). One common application in this domain is to understand the impact of changes in reservoir releases on outcomes such as instream recreation (Ward and Lynch 1996) and protection of endangered fish species (Ward and Booker 2003).…”

Water resource development on the Ganges: moving beyond ambiguity

“…Their competing interests can be a source of water conflicts as well and lack of clarity in understanding their objectives, preferences over different scenarios, constraints and potential reactions can present significant challenges to decision-makers charged with preparing for international cooperative efforts. Mullick et al (2013) present a case in point, focusing on the complexity of dealing with competing off-and in-stream demands in the allocation of water resources along the Teesta River in Bangladesh. With AQUARIUS, a generalized hydrologic-economic optimization model, they show that maximizing economic benefit by allocating flow to irrigation results in compromising the goal of environmental protection, whereas upholding in-stream flow constraints for environmental protection would result in significant economic losses of irrigation benefits.…”

HR water consumption marginal benefits and its spatial–temporal disparities in Henan Province, China

“…First, in industrial water consumption, Ku et al [4] calculated the output elasticity and value of industrial water on the basis of data on 53,912 manufacturing firms in Korea, Mejías et al [5] evaluated the efficiency of industrial water-charging systems in Spain and Ireland. Second, in irrigation water consumption, the economic value of irrigation water was analyzed [6] and estimated using the residual imputation method in the Teesta River, Bangladesh [7], and Ohab-Yazdi and Ahmadi [8] used genetic-algorithm-based optimization model to evaluate the potential maximum net benefit of irrigation water. Third, in urban water consumption, Hester and Larson [9] used breakpoint and decomposition analyses to study changes in water use for three North Carolina cities between 1990 and 2014, and Ghimire et al [10] determined the price and income elasticity of household water demand under the unified water price.…”