2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.08.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginal costs and co-benefits of energy efficiency investments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
111
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A far more comprehensive analysis is provided by Jakob (2006). While this refers to renovations in Switzerland rather than Germany, it is useful for comparative purposes because weather conditions, building infrastructure and building codes are similar in the two countries (though costs differ).…”
Section: A Comprehensive Swiss Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A far more comprehensive analysis is provided by Jakob (2006). While this refers to renovations in Switzerland rather than Germany, it is useful for comparative purposes because weather conditions, building infrastructure and building codes are similar in the two countries (though costs differ).…”
Section: A Comprehensive Swiss Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Enseling and Hinz, who monitored the actual thermal performance of dwellings post-renovation, Jakob (2006) estimates performance using standardised thermal transmission values for the various techniques and standards of thermal renovation undertaken. Further, Jakob (2006) uses the measure of marginal, rather than absolute, costs. This enables him to make meaningful comparisons without knowing the pre-renovation energy consumption of the buildings.…”
Section: A Comprehensive Swiss Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations