Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: Effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives

Khoroushi, Maryam; Karvandi, Tayebeh Mansouri; Kamali, Bentolhoda; Mazaheri, Hamid

doi:10.4103/0970-9290.102234

Cited by 19 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Theoretical and experimental considerations of the wear and mechanical properties of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites, as compared with materials containing fillers in the micrometer range, have indicated the improved performance of the nanofilled and nanohybrid composites. 13 Recently, Palaniappan and others 43 tested the null hypothesis that there are no differences between the clinical-wear performances of nanofilled, microfilled, and conventional hybrids placed in Class I and Class II cavities. The findings of the five-year clinical trial revealed that operators and preparation type can affect restoration wear magnitude but do not contribute to increased functional risk of fracture or harmful effects on pulp and periodontal biocompatibility.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It has been reported 43 that the analysis of variance of bond strength data becomes more consistent when the specimens lost prematurely are considered for statistical analysis and that their omission can provide a significant overestimation of the results. Many studies in the literature do not consider premature failures; consequently, those findings might not accurately reflect the bonding performance, 44,45 leading to false interpretations.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…70 Some manufacturers and researchers are now starting to provide this information. 13,26,43,56,63,64,[68][69][70] Ideally, the LCU should deliver a well collimated beam of light with minimal reduction in irradiance over clinically relevant distances (up to 8 mm from the tip).…”

Section: C) Effect Of Distancementioning

confidence: 99%

“…As the power output from LED units has increased, the potential for generating damaging temperature values in pulp and oral tissues has also increased. 13,43,44,46,47,50,51,118 Leprince et al 15 assessed the effects of light source characteristics and irradiation time on temperature increase in the pulp chamber of an extracted molar tooth. They reported that the temperature rise increased with longer exposure times and as the LCU light output increased.…”

Section: Hazards Of Delivering Too Much Energymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…13,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] Additionally, when dental RBCs are not optimally cured (and thus do not reach a sufficient degree of monomer conversion), they are more likely to leach toxic substances. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] At the same time, since light curing delivers energy that causes a temperature increase in the tooth and surrounding oral tissues, [13][14][15][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] arbitrarily increasing exposure times in an effort to prevent under-curing may damage the pulp and surrounding tissues.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Full Issue PDF

2014

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How to Register as an Individual or Institutional UserIt's easy to register. Simply choose a unique user name and password and complete our registration form at http://www.jopdentonline.org/action/registration. You will receive an e-mail confirming your user name and password shortly after registering. Registration is not required for individuals to use this site but is required to see the full text of a non-public access article. Using the User Profile to Customize Your Online ExperienceOnce you have registered, you can customize your profile in the User Profile section of the site. Within the User Profile section you can: Update your profile information, including your user name and password, address details and account preferences, manage your favorite articles, sign up for journal e-mail alerts, view saved searches, and manage your subscriptions and online access (for institutional subscribers only). For additional assistance with your profile, complete our feedback form at http://www.jopdentonline.org/ feedback/show Your user name and password can be sent to the e-mail address provided during the registration process at any time. Follow the instructions at http://www.jopdentonline.org/action/requestResetPassword to obtain your user name and password by e-mail. Aim and ScopeOperative Dentistry publishes articles that ad vance the prac tice of operative dentistry. The scope of the journal includes conservation and restoration of teeth; the sci en tifi c foundation of operative dental ther a py; dental materials; den tal education; and the social, po lit i cal, and economic aspects of dental prac tice. Review papers, book reviews, letters and classified ads for faculty positions are also pub lished.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: C) Effect Of Distancementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Hazards Of Delivering Too Much Energymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Full Issue PDF

2014

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Equipment, Ergonomics and Magnification Workflow

Bud

2024

Direct Restorations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations—recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting

Hickel

Mesinger

Opdam³

et al. 2022

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The FDI criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect dental restorations were first published in 2007 and updated in 2010. Meanwhile, their scientific use increased steadily, but several questions from users justified some clarification and improvement of the living document. Materials and methods An expert panel (N = 10) initiated the revision and consensus process that included a kick-off workshop and multiple online meetings by using the Delphi method. During and after each round of discussion, all opinions were collected, and the aggregated summary was presented to the experts aiming to adjust the wording of the criteria as precisely as possible. Finally, the expert panel agreed on the revision. Results Some categories were redefined, ambiguities were cleared, and the descriptions of all scores were harmonized to cross-link different clinical situations with possible management strategies: reviewing/monitoring (score 1–4), refurbishment/reseal (score 3), repair (score 4), and replacement (score 5). Functional properties (domain F: fracture of material and retention, marginal adaptation, proximal contact, form and contour, occlusion and wear) were now placed at the beginning followed by biological (domain B: caries at restoration margin, hard tissue defects, postoperative hypersensitivity) and aesthetic characteristics (domain A: surface luster and texture, marginal staining, color match). Conclusion The most frequently used eleven categories of the FDI criteria set were revised for better understanding and handling. Clinical relevance The improved description and structuring of the criteria may help to standardize the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations and may enhance their acceptance by researchers, teachers, and dental practitioners.

show abstract

Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: Effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives

Abstract: Use of two-step self-etch adhesive, prior to restoring cervical cavities with RMGIC, seems to be more efficacious than the conventional cavity conditioner in decreasing marginal microleakage.

Cited by 19 publications

References 15 publications

Full Issue PDF

Full Issue PDF

Equipment, Ergonomics and Magnification Workflow

Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations—recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About