2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7796(02)00119-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginal transmission pricing and supplemental cost allocation method: A case of Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the increasing penetration of DER at distribution level forces the need to adapt traditional cost allocation methods used in transmission system to the distribution level. In general, the cost allocation methods for transmission systems may be classified into three distinct categories: nodal marginal methods [3][4][5][6][7]; rolled-in methods [8][9][10][11]; embeddedmethods [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The cost allocation based on nodal marginal pricing for transmission systems is presented in [3][4][5], in which are considered the long-term and short-term marginal costs related to energy, reliability, investments and demand side.…”
Section: Literature Review and Specific Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the increasing penetration of DER at distribution level forces the need to adapt traditional cost allocation methods used in transmission system to the distribution level. In general, the cost allocation methods for transmission systems may be classified into three distinct categories: nodal marginal methods [3][4][5][6][7]; rolled-in methods [8][9][10][11]; embeddedmethods [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. The cost allocation based on nodal marginal pricing for transmission systems is presented in [3][4][5], in which are considered the long-term and short-term marginal costs related to energy, reliability, investments and demand side.…”
Section: Literature Review and Specific Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest and most common approach in allocating network cost is the so-called postage stamp or rolledin method [24,25]. The postage stamp method used throughout the utility industry, allocates the embedded capital costs and the average annual operation and maintenance costs of existing transmission facilities.…”
Section: Avoided Network Capacity Cost (Ancc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transmission systems expense, the technique by which it is handled, is a Top priority issue in the power sector. As a result of improved transmitting capacity, the cost differentials affected utility companies and the dramatic growth of non‐utility generation function 6 . Throughout certain countries globally, the energy supply sector endures transition with controlled to the restructured system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%