“…The study was to explore the subjective experience of men and women who worked with computer technology daily and who had shared pleasures in, and identification with, technology. It drew heavily on the literature of gender and technology (Berg, 1994(Berg, , 1997Berg & Lie, 1995;Broos, 2005;Broos & Roe, 2005;Cockburn, 1983Cockburn, , 1985aCockburn, , 1985bCockburn, , 1992Cockburn & Fürst-Dilic, 1994;Cockburn & Ormrod, 1993;Faulkner, 2000Faulkner, , 2001Faulkner, , 2004Hacker, 1981Hacker, , 1989Hacker, , 1990Lagesen, 2007;Moll & Shade, 2001van Zoonen, 2002;Wajcman, 1991Wajcman, , 1999Wajcman, , 2000Wajcman, , 2006Wajcman & MacKenzie, 1999), as well as on recent studies on the digital gender gap and inclusion initiatives, such as that associated with the European SIGIS project (Lie & Sørensen, 2003;MacKeogh & Preston, 2003;Oudshoorn, Rommes, & van Slooten, 2004). The results support the premise of two-way (technology and gender) mutual shaping and, in doing so, rise to the call from Lagesen (2012) for more research on "explor [ing] what different ways of relating to technologies may mean for the doing of gender" (p. 447).…”