1973
DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1973.tb00952.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginalization Paradoxes in Bayesian and Structural Inference

Abstract: Summary We describe a range of routine statistical problems in which marginal posterior distributions derived from improper prior measures are found to have an unBayesian property—one that could not occur if proper prior measures were employed. This paradoxical possibility is shown to have several facets that can be successfully analysed in the framework of a general group structure. The results cast a shadow on the uncritical use of improper prior measures. A separate examination of a particular application o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
117
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…One can see that in refs. [9,[18][19][20][30][31]. Therefore Definition 5 is applied to the situation in which the fiducial inferences have a frequentist meaning, such as the regular parametric function given in Definition 6.…”
Section: Marginal Fiducial Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One can see that in refs. [9,[18][19][20][30][31]. Therefore Definition 5 is applied to the situation in which the fiducial inferences have a frequentist meaning, such as the regular parametric function given in Definition 6.…”
Section: Marginal Fiducial Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many discussions on them, including some controversies, can be found in refs. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. The views of Efron [24] about the fiducial inference should be noted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some references on these critical issues are Berger et al (1988), Dawid et al (1973) and Regazzini (1983, pp. 83-97).…”
Section: Some Noninfonnative Priorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the prior distribution has a problem with it which is too subjective [20]. To compensate, studies of noninformative prior distribution have been carried out and applied to situations where information is lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%