2015
DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsv038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marginally scientific? Genetic testing of children and adolescents for lifestyle and health promotion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 In addition, the heavily promotional language often associated with PM (such as the term "revolution") has been criticized for contributing to inaccurate public representations of science 22 and unrealistic public expectations, 23 as well as facilitating a market for unproven products and services. 24 Finally, some have suggested that an emphasis on PM may result in an inappropriate shift from public health initiatives to those focused on the individual. 5,25 Because a large body of research has detailed issues concerning the hype 26 and overly optimistic portrayals of biomedical research, 27 a primary analytical focus of this study was to assess the degree to which PM has been portrayed as beneficial in light of the concerns also being raised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In addition, the heavily promotional language often associated with PM (such as the term "revolution") has been criticized for contributing to inaccurate public representations of science 22 and unrealistic public expectations, 23 as well as facilitating a market for unproven products and services. 24 Finally, some have suggested that an emphasis on PM may result in an inappropriate shift from public health initiatives to those focused on the individual. 5,25 Because a large body of research has detailed issues concerning the hype 26 and overly optimistic portrayals of biomedical research, 27 a primary analytical focus of this study was to assess the degree to which PM has been portrayed as beneficial in light of the concerns also being raised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, the first single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) mapped to the fat mass and obesity-associated ( FTO ) gene region were found to be associated with body mass index (BMI) [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Subsequent identification of other SNPs has accelerated the characterization of the effects of different variant combinations on obesity phenotype, as well as their interactions with environmental factors, such as dietary habits, lifestyle, and physical activity [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. In addition, the market for the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genomic testing has emerged [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have argued that “the embedding of genetic testing in a healthcare setting can ensure a context where due emphasis is being provided on the individualized medical supervision of patients, the presence of pre-test and post-test counseling, psychological evaluation and follow-up if appropriate and quality assurance of the tests performed” (Ayme et al 2013 ). However, there are discussions regarding whether this should also apply to categories of tests that are labeled as “informational” or “recreational” or that do not offer any assessment of disease risk (Caulfield et al 2015 ). Second, legislators can also impact the extent to which genetic tests are occurring within the scope of the healthcare system.…”
Section: Industry Governments and Citizensmentioning
confidence: 99%