2003
DOI: 10.1256/wea.146.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Margules's tendency equation and Richardson's forecast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We leave variable density and orography for later discussion. As noted by Margules in 1904 (Lynch 2003), vertical wind derived from the continuity equation is very error prone at large scales (Holton 2012). The Helmholtz decomposition (Wippermann 1957;Lorenz 1960;Koshyk and Hamilton 2001) is therefore essential for this approach.…”
Section: The Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We leave variable density and orography for later discussion. As noted by Margules in 1904 (Lynch 2003), vertical wind derived from the continuity equation is very error prone at large scales (Holton 2012). The Helmholtz decomposition (Wippermann 1957;Lorenz 1960;Koshyk and Hamilton 2001) is therefore essential for this approach.…”
Section: The Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where U s (T ) = e 0.0666T −23.96 (14) is the humidity of saturation, a function of the air temperature T whose values are the maximal amount of kg of water vapour that a kg of dry air can contain. This function has been obtained fitting well known values, its graph is represented in Figure 3.5.…”
Section: Evaporationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meteorology is in fact driven by such energy, and its main macroscopic indicator, the temperature, depends on the thermal inertia of the materials being irradiated and on the heat exchange among the different materials composing the surface of the planet. Relying on these ingredients, early meteorologists considered weather forecasting impossible [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One problem with weather-forecasting computer models is that they do not explicitly take inertia-gravity waves into account, for reasons discussed by Lynch (2003). They are only represented implicitly, by using a parametrization of their expected effects on the flow.…”
Section: Storm In a Teacupmentioning
confidence: 99%