2017
DOI: 10.1080/19325037.2017.1292878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marijuana and College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The integration of cannabis into the student culture was shown by perceptions of the prevalence of their peers' lifetime use (82%) and regular use (40.8% males, 36.7% females), the reported ease of acquiring cannabis, and students' perceptions that cannabis is likely to be available at a typical student party. Despite past research showing that students overestimate their peers' use of cannabis, 18,[34][35][36] our reported rates of prevalence align closely with those reported from a robust NZ longitudinal study (lifetime use = 80%, regular use = 34%), 31 suggesting that students' perceptions of their peers' cannabis use might not have been overestimated in our sample. The examination of ease of acquisition and availability of cannabis as a function of whether students had more or less regular-using peers revealed that peers influence cannabis use, in accordance with Goldstick et al 32 Having a larger proportion of friends who are regular users increases the reported ease of acquisition and the reported likelihood of cannabis being available at a typical social occasion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The integration of cannabis into the student culture was shown by perceptions of the prevalence of their peers' lifetime use (82%) and regular use (40.8% males, 36.7% females), the reported ease of acquiring cannabis, and students' perceptions that cannabis is likely to be available at a typical student party. Despite past research showing that students overestimate their peers' use of cannabis, 18,[34][35][36] our reported rates of prevalence align closely with those reported from a robust NZ longitudinal study (lifetime use = 80%, regular use = 34%), 31 suggesting that students' perceptions of their peers' cannabis use might not have been overestimated in our sample. The examination of ease of acquisition and availability of cannabis as a function of whether students had more or less regular-using peers revealed that peers influence cannabis use, in accordance with Goldstick et al 32 Having a larger proportion of friends who are regular users increases the reported ease of acquisition and the reported likelihood of cannabis being available at a typical social occasion.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Although the influence of peers decreases from adolescence into the mid to late twenties, perceived peer behavior remains an important influence on cannabis use 32 and correlates with actual use. 27,33 It should be noted, however, that there is a tendency for students to overestimate their peers' use 34 and these normative discrepancies can lead to misconceptions that certain risk behaviors are more common than they actually are, 18,35,36 resulting in greater engagement in the behavior. 16 Given the influence of peers, and to a lesser extent gender, integration and perceptions of informal and formal controls were also examined as a function of gender and whether or not students had a large number of regular-using peers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…College and university students may be at particular risk: not only are they likely to encounter opportunities to use cannabis as part of their college environments ( Allen et al, 2017 , Pinchevsky et al, 2012 ) and alter their attitudes and initiate use once in college ( Pinchevsky et al, 2012 , Stewart and Moreno, 2013 ), they are also likely to experience multiple adverse educational, health, and other consequences of such cannabis use, including dependence ( Suerken et al, 2016 , Bravo et al, 2019 , Gunn et al, 2018 , Arria et al, 2017 , Martinez et al, 2015 , Caldeira et al, 2012 , Arria et al, 2015 , Meda et al, 2017 , Arria et al, 2016 , Caldeira et al, 2008 , Pearson et al, 2017 ). Cannabis use remains relatively common across campuses ( Schulenberg et al, 2019 , Arria et al, 2017 , Pearson et al, 2017 , Blavos et al, 2017 , Patrick et al, 2019 ), and it may become even more so given that the perceptions of its normativeness are high among university students ( Dempsey et al, 2016 , Kollath-Cattano et al, 2020 ) and the perceptions of its harmfulness are declining among youth in general ( Pacek et al, 2015 , Burdzovic Andreas, 2019 , Kilwein et al, 2020 ). Furthermore, this population of young adults may be particularly sensitive to the ongoing shifts in the legal status of cannabis in many jurisdictions ( Miller et al, 2017 , Kerr et al, 2018 , Barker and Moreno, 2020 , Wang et al, 2019 , Jones et al, 2018 , Alley et al, 2020 ), including the pending drug reform and the possibility of decriminalization of recreational cannabis use in Norway in the near future ( Høring - Rusreform fra straff til hjelp, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2018, about 35% of young adults aged 18 to 25 reported past-year cannabis use (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration, 2019). Rates of cannabis use and trauma exposure on U.S. colleges are high (Blavos et al, 2017; Johnston et al, 2016). In a sample of students from 11 colleges, Suerken and colleagues (2014) found that 30% of students reported using cannabis before college and 8.5% of students who did not use cannabis before college reported initiating use during their first year.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%