Marine fauna of Mljet National Park (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). 7. Echiura

Zavodnik, Dušan

doi:10.20302/nc.2017.26.3

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The recorded isopod richness in the Slovenian Sea is relatively high compared to regions of similar size elsewhere in the Adriatic (Zavodnik & Kovačić 2000;Zavodnik et al 2006). Thirty recorded species in the Slovenian Sea represent almost 40% of all species listed for the Adriatic Sea (Castelló et al 2020).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Seznam izopodov (Crustacea: Isopoda) v Sloveniji

Vittori,

Mavrič,

Pekolj

et al. 2023

Nat Slov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Isopods are a diverse peracarid crustacean group with marine, freshwater and terrestrial representatives. Isopod species lists were typically prepared according to different habitats, which was true also for Slovenia. Here, we prepared the first unified overview of isopod species for Slovenia, which is also the first list of marine isopods in the country. We examined scientific publications, research reports and institutional databases. A total of 126 species have been recorded in Slovenia, of which 31 are marine, 21 are found in freshwater, and 74 are terrestrial. Of these, we report on seven marine and one terrestrial species for the first time. A major part of freshwater isopod richness is linked to the subterranean environment, where most endemic species for the country can be found. Among marine species, many are parasites, with potential economic impact, and two species are considered introduced. When the new species list is considered with valid national legislation, only 41 species retained the same taxonomic status. Many synonyms and invalid taxa according to recent taxonomy point out the need for revision the national red list of Malacostraca as well as other nature protection acts.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Seznam izopodov (Crustacea: Isopoda) v Sloveniji

Vittori,

Mavrič,

Pekolj

et al. 2023

Nat Slov

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Interestingly, the use of "biotope" in the benthic mapping literature has drifted to now refer specifically to biological communities in some cases (e.g., HELCOM, 2013;Elvenes et al, 2014;Neves et al, 2014, Schiele et al, 2015, which were originally defined by Moebius (1877) as the "biocoenosis" that inhabit the abiotic "biotopes" (Dimitrakopoulos & Troumbis, 2008). Meanwhile, this original definition of "biocoenosis" is retained in many places (e.g., Zavodnik et al, 2005;Göltenboth et al, 2006;Dauvin et al, 2008a;Maiorano et al, 2011;Sloss et al, 2013). Additional detailed discussion may be found in Olenin & Ducrotoy (2006), Dauvin et al (2008a, 2008b, who called for greater clarity in the use of terminology for benthic habitat mapping.…”

Section: Types Of Thematic Mapsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Benthic habitat mapping: A review of three decades of mapping biological patterns on the seafloor

Misiuk,

Brown

2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

What is benthic habitat mapping, how is it accomplished, and how has that changed over time? We query the published literature to answer these questions and synthesize the results quantitatively to provide a comprehensive review of the field over the past three decades. Categories of benthic habitat maps are differentiated unambiguously by the response variable (i.e., the subject being mapped) rather than the approaches used to produce the map. Additional terminology in the literature is clarified and defined based on provenance, statistical criteria, and common usage. Mapping approaches, models, data sets, technologies, and a range of other attributes are reviewed based on their application, and we document changes to the ways that these components have been integrated to map benthic habitats over time. We found that the use of acoustic remote sensing has been surpassed by optical methods for obtaining benthic environmental data. Although a wide variety of approaches are employed to ground truth habitat maps, underwater imagery has become the most common validation tool – surpassing physical sampling. The use of empirical machine learning models to process these data has increased dramatically over the past 10 years, and has superseded expert manual interpretation. We discuss how map products derived from these data and approaches are used to address ecological questions in the emerging field of seascape ecology, and how remote sensing technologies and field survey logistics pose different challenges to this research field across benthic ecosystems from intertidal and shallow sublittoral regions to the deep ocean. Outstanding challenges are identified and discussed in context with the trajectory of the field.

show abstract

Chasing the green echiuran worm Bonellia in tidal pools of Okinawa

Taniguchi

Zhang

et al. 2022

Frontiers in Biological Detection: From Nanosensors to Systems XIV

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marine fauna of Mljet National Park (Adriatic Sea, Croatia). 7. Echiura

Cited by 3 publications

References 6 publications

Seznam izopodov (Crustacea: Isopoda) v Sloveniji

Seznam izopodov (Crustacea: Isopoda) v Sloveniji

Benthic habitat mapping: A review of three decades of mapping biological patterns on the seafloor

Chasing the green echiuran worm Bonellia in tidal pools of Okinawa

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About