2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-56985-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Mammal Bioacustics Using Towed Array Systems in the Western South Atlantic Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of PAM as a monitoring method aboard seismic surveys has evolved over the years. Although considered an optional measure in the BOEM NTLs, PAM was required in some permit conditions after 2010 and was stipulated in the 2013 settlement agreement for all deep-penetration surveys conducted in water depths over 100 m. PAM has generally become a widely accepted monitoring method for marine mammal mitigation on seismic vessels [ 11 , 17 ] due, in part, to the continued improvement of PAM systems and its demonstrated efficacy in both research and other monitoring applications [ 17 20 ]. The efficacy of towed PAM systems is limited for low frequency species and very little is published about quantifying PAM’s efficacy as a seismic mitigation measure [ 17 , 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation of PAM as a monitoring method aboard seismic surveys has evolved over the years. Although considered an optional measure in the BOEM NTLs, PAM was required in some permit conditions after 2010 and was stipulated in the 2013 settlement agreement for all deep-penetration surveys conducted in water depths over 100 m. PAM has generally become a widely accepted monitoring method for marine mammal mitigation on seismic vessels [ 11 , 17 ] due, in part, to the continued improvement of PAM systems and its demonstrated efficacy in both research and other monitoring applications [ 17 20 ]. The efficacy of towed PAM systems is limited for low frequency species and very little is published about quantifying PAM’s efficacy as a seismic mitigation measure [ 17 , 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…demonstrated efficacy in both research and other monitoring applications [17][18][19][20]. The efficacy of towed PAM systems is limited for low frequency species and very little is published about quantifying PAM's efficacy as a seismic mitigation measure [17,21].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As médias dos parâmetros acústicos dos sinais acústicos das espécies de odontocetos da biblioteca de identificação foram apresentados individualmente por espécie, juntamente com as médias de variáveis acústicas de populações de outras localidades (Tabela 9,10,11,12 e 13,e as Figuras 39,40,41,42 e 43). Com esta comparação verificou-se que o repertório acústico de T. truncatus deste estudo é semelhante ao de populações da quebra da plataforma continental do Oceano Atlântico Sul ocidental (Andriolo et al, 2018) e da costa do Rio de Janeiro . Assim como os assobios de S. frontalis deste estudo se aproximaram aos descritos por Azevedo et al (2010) (Sirosky, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified