Marine management for human development: A review of two decades of scholarly evidence

Carneiro, Gonçalo

doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.015

Cited by 24 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 62 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In regards to temporal heterogeneity, although the impacts of protected areas can be related to their duration of establishment [21,22], the few evaluations that use longitudinal data [11] tend not to examine impacts over multiple time periods (but see [15]). Existing evaluations have also generally overlooked potential heterogeneity of socioeconomic impacts, generally focusing on one or very few poverty metrics [13,23].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated conservation and development: evaluating a community-based marine protected area project for equality of socioeconomic impacts

Gurney

Pressey

Cinner

et al. 2015

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite the prevalence of protected areas, evidence of their impacts on people is weak and remains hotly contested in conservation policy. A key question in this debate is whether socioeconomic impacts vary according to social subgroup. Given that social inequity can create conflict and impede poverty reduction, understanding how protected areas differentially affect people is critical to designing them to achieve social and biological goals. Understanding heterogeneous responses to protected areas can improve targeting of management activities and help elucidate the pathways through which impacts of protected areas occur. Here, we assessed whether the socioeconomic impacts of marine protected areas (MPAs)—designed to achieve goals for both conservation and poverty alleviation—differed according to age, gender or religion in associated villages in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. Using data from pre-, mid- and post-implementation of the MPAs for control and project villages, we found little empirical evidence that impacts on five key socioeconomic indicators related to poverty differed according to social subgroup. We found suggestive empirical evidence that the effect of the MPAs on environmental knowledge differed by age and religion; over the medium and long terms, younger people and Muslims showed greater improvements compared with older people and Christians, respectively.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated conservation and development: evaluating a community-based marine protected area project for equality of socioeconomic impacts

Gurney

Pressey

Cinner

et al. 2015

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Unlike traditional or narrative literature reviews, such as the expert point of view or position papers on a particular topic (e.g. Carneiro, 2011), the systematic review is a process through which a sample of works/studies is methodically chosen, the targeted information is extracted, and the results reported with transparency about the methods used in each step (Hunt, 1997).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cooper and McLaughlin (1998) analyze the "contemporary multidisciplinary approaches to coastal classification and environmental risk analysis" (p. 512) in terms of scale of application, variables included, mode of analysis, mode of presentation, and the nature of the risks being assessed. Carneiro (2011) explores "the evidence of the impacts of marine management interventions on human development and well-being reported in marine management literature in the past two decades" (p. 351). His study addresses peer-reviewed literature dealing with fisheries, aquaculture, marine conservation, and CZM in terms of methodologies used, human development dimensions considered, and results reported.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nobre (2011) reviews management instruments to address coastal zone problems and of some research areas to support management. Although very interesting, these reviews consider only some specific uses of socio-economic information, such as the problem definition step of CZM (Cooper and McLaughlin, 1998) and the impact assessments of management initiatives (Carneiro, 2011;Nobre, 2011). All these studies take the form of a narrative literature review.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A systematic review of socio-economic assessments in support of coastal zone management (1992–2011)

Gentil

Mongruel

2015

Journal of Environmental Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperation between the social and natural sciences has become essential in order to encompass all the dimensions of coastal zone management. Socio-economic approaches are increasingly recommended to complement integrated assessment in support of these initiatives. A systematic review of the academic literature was carried out in order to analyze the main types of socio-economic assessments used to inform the coastal zone management process as well as their effectiveness. A corpus of 1682 articles published between 1992 and 2011 was identified by means of the representative coverage approach, from which 170 were selected by applying inclusion/exclusion criteria and then classified using a content analysis methodology. The percentage of articles that mention the use of socio-economic assessment in support of coastal zone management initiatives is increasing but remains relatively low. The review examines the links between the issues addressed by integrated assessments and the chosen analytical frameworks as well as the various economic assessment methods which are used in the successive steps of the coastal zone management process. The results show that i) analytical frameworks such as 'risk and vulnerability', 'DPSIR', 'valuation', 'ecosystem services' and 'preferences' are likely to lead to effective integration of social sciences in coastal zone management research while 'integration', 'sustainability' and 'participation' remain difficult to operationalize, ii) risk assessments are insufficiently implemented in developing countries, and iii) indicator systems in support of multi-criteria analyses could be used during more stages of the coastal zone management process. Finally, it is suggested that improved collaboration between science and management would require that scientists currently involved in coastal zone management processes further educate themselves in integrated assessment approaches and participatory methodologies.

show abstract

“…In addition to occupational experience, the employees in this sector are expected to be literate and have computer skills [18]. Furthermore, Carneiro (2011) [19] reported that poor people have been alienated in the aquaculture sector because of their inability to invest in the sector.…”

Section: Working Conditionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Environmental and Social Risks and Solution Criteria in Offshore Aquaculture Systems

Baki¹,

Öztürk²

2017

IJERA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aquaculture is a sector that involves agricultural activities aiming to meet the increasing animal food demand, contribute to balanced and healthy diet and reduce the hunting pressure on natural fish stocks. In aquaculture activities in sea, producers who are aware of the major role of obtaining an ecological balance in production regard coast utilization and environmental management as a part of production. Therefore, determination of environmental factors in production activities is highly important for sustainable aquaculture. The present study aims to determine the environmental risks and solution criteria in offshore aquaculture systems in Turkish seas. Environmental and social risks in production are collected under the main headings comprising nutrient and waste load in water, feeding, overuse of antibiotics and chemicals, fish escape, diseases, working conditions and common areas; solution criteria are collected under the main headings comprising ecosystem, water management, feed properties, legal procedure, chemical use, field management and occupational health and safety.

show abstract

Marine management for human development: A review of two decades of scholarly evidence

Cited by 24 publications

References 62 publications

Integrated conservation and development: evaluating a community-based marine protected area project for equality of socioeconomic impacts

Integrated conservation and development: evaluating a community-based marine protected area project for equality of socioeconomic impacts

A systematic review of socio-economic assessments in support of coastal zone management (1992–2011)

Environmental and Social Risks and Solution Criteria in Offshore Aquaculture Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About