2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine propeller underwater radiated noise prediction with the FWH acoustic analogy Part 2: Assessment of model scale propeller hydroacoustic performance under non-uniform flow conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the DDES method has shown improvements in predicting mid-frequency noise, accurately forecasting high-frequency noise remains challenging. Sezen et al [16] proposed that the absence of cavitation bubble dynamics in CFD calculations of propeller cavitation is the main reason for the discrepancy between the URN of CFD predictions and full scale observations. Zhang et al [17] found that noise predictions from both LES-FW-H hybrid methods and LES with Powell vortex sound theory were comparable, demonstrating the potential of numerical models in accurately simulating cavitation noise from resolvable structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the DDES method has shown improvements in predicting mid-frequency noise, accurately forecasting high-frequency noise remains challenging. Sezen et al [16] proposed that the absence of cavitation bubble dynamics in CFD calculations of propeller cavitation is the main reason for the discrepancy between the URN of CFD predictions and full scale observations. Zhang et al [17] found that noise predictions from both LES-FW-H hybrid methods and LES with Powell vortex sound theory were comparable, demonstrating the potential of numerical models in accurately simulating cavitation noise from resolvable structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both underwater tunnel blasting and conventional tunnel blasting produce vibration, but the vibration they produce is different in the following points [12][13][14][15]. (1) Propagation medium: the vibration of underwater tunnel blasting is propagated through water, while the vibration of conventional tunnel blasting is propagated through soil or rock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these representations are investigated in two groups: non-discretized propeller approaches and discretized propeller approaches. The former includes actuator disc models (Đurasević et al, 2022;Jasak et al, 2019;Villa et al, 2019) and body force models based on Blade Element Momentum Theory (BEMT) (Feng et al, 2020), while the latter covers Moving Reference Frame (MRF) (Sezen et al, 2021), sliding mesh (Kinaci et al, 2018;Sezen and Atlar, 2023;Wang et al, 2021), and overset mesh (Đurasević et al, 2022) techniques. For example, within the scope of non-discretized propeller approaches, Sezen et al (2018) modeled the propeller as an actuator disc based on the body force method coupled with the experimental open water data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%