1996
DOI: 10.1139/e96-123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine reservoir corrections for bowhead whale radiocarbon age determinations

Abstract: Twenty-two pairs of radiocarbon dates on driftwood and bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) bones from raised beaches, dates on whale bone and terrestrial plant detritus from a stratigraphie section, and 25 additional dates on whale bones from the lowest (≤1 ka BP) raised beaches in the eastern Canadian Arctic suggest that a marine reservoir correction of about −200 years is appropriate for normalized age determinations on bone collagen from the bowhead whale in this region. This is less than the correction (−40… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, there is reason to question whether age determinations from marine shell and those from marine vertebrates manifest the same magnitude of departure from determinations derived from terrestrial organisms (e.g., Dyke et al, 1996;Ingram and Southon, 1996). As we show here, samples from Nunivak Island appear to demonstrate a significant difference in this respect, with determinations from shell slightly closer to those from terrestrial materials, although substantially more variant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, there is reason to question whether age determinations from marine shell and those from marine vertebrates manifest the same magnitude of departure from determinations derived from terrestrial organisms (e.g., Dyke et al, 1996;Ingram and Southon, 1996). As we show here, samples from Nunivak Island appear to demonstrate a significant difference in this respect, with determinations from shell slightly closer to those from terrestrial materials, although substantially more variant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…Dyke et al (1996, with additional references) minimize the problem of old wood, pointing out (among other things) that wood not locked in ice will remain buoyant for less than two years. Thus, whereas the use of driftwood may not be problematic enough to eliminate its use for dating, the possibility remains in the North that wood found in sites in treeless areas had been frozen in along the shores for some years before collected, or that such wood consists of only the inner rings of what were once larger tree trunks.…”
Section: St Lawrence Islandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ages are reported as conventionally normalized for carbon fractionation and without a marine reservoir adjustment. The latter adjustment would reduce the ages by two or more centuries (e.g., Dyke et al, 1996b). The general sparsity of bones, along with the results of the radiocarbon dating (Table 2) and the age estimates (based on regional sea-level history) for the undated samples (Table 1), suggests that bowheads rarely ranged into this region during the last 4 ka (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results in Supplementary Table S2 were calibrated using the INTCAL09 Marine modelled curve 46 . Accounting for a reliable reservoir offset is difficult, as the reservoir may vary through time in single locations and the mammals themselves are migratory species and their protein intake varies, and probably crosses different reservoirs 47 . For this reason we have corrected the radiocarbon dates using a delta-R value of 0 and estimated an uncertainty of 40 years.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%