2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.quageo.2020.101126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine reservoir corrections for the Caribbean demonstrate high intra- and inter-island variability in local reservoir offsets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A consistent identification of DOs outside the North Atlantic is still hampered by low-resolution chronologies, a lack of well-fingerprinted tephra for instantaneous dating, and poorlyconstrained reservoir effects in marine records. The most updated regional reservoir corrections (Heaton et al, 2020) or R (Stuiver and Braziunas, 1993;Reimer and Reimer, 2017) still rely on limited data points in the American tropics, including updated locations in the Caribbean (DiNapoli et al, 2021), and the west Atlantic off the Brazilian Coast (Alves et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2019). The weighted mean of regional differences in marine reservoir error can vary from −229 years using Caribbean ages to −128 years using ages off the Brazilian coast, while the uncertainty varies from 165 to 111 (Table 1).…”
Section: Chronological Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A consistent identification of DOs outside the North Atlantic is still hampered by low-resolution chronologies, a lack of well-fingerprinted tephra for instantaneous dating, and poorlyconstrained reservoir effects in marine records. The most updated regional reservoir corrections (Heaton et al, 2020) or R (Stuiver and Braziunas, 1993;Reimer and Reimer, 2017) still rely on limited data points in the American tropics, including updated locations in the Caribbean (DiNapoli et al, 2021), and the west Atlantic off the Brazilian Coast (Alves et al, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2019). The weighted mean of regional differences in marine reservoir error can vary from −229 years using Caribbean ages to −128 years using ages off the Brazilian coast, while the uncertainty varies from 165 to 111 (Table 1).…”
Section: Chronological Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Date1_IntCal20_S and Date1_IntCal20_E are respectively the starting and ending calibrated age using the OxCal online tool for calibration based on the IntCal and Marine20 calibration curves [17][18]. For marine shell dates, the mean regional correction to the reservoir effect has been used (-146 +/-114 year) based on DiNapoli et al [19].…”
Section: Sites Table (Sites_en and Sites_fr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We revised the ΔR values to reflect updates to the Marine20 calibration curve 100 . Following methods in DiNapoli et al 103 , we calculated the error-weighted pooled mean with external variance added for these ΔR values to be −214 ± 16 (χ 2 9:0.05 = 11.0 < 16.9;…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%