2021
DOI: 10.1177/15485129211036044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine seismic signal denoising using VMD with Hausdorff distance and wavelet transform

Abstract: In marine seismic acquisitions, signal interference remains a major menace. In this paper, a denoising approach based on the Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) combined with the Hausdorff distance (HD) and Wavelet transform (WT) is proposed. There has been substantial research in this field over the years. However, traditional denoising methods fall short of achieving satisfactory results in an extremely low signal to noise ratio (SNR) environment. The feasibility, and stability of the proposed method was va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, common methods for identifying effective microseismic signals include parametric analysis, waveform analysis, wavelet transform, pattern recognition, etc. But most of these methods require manual processing, which is subject to the unstable classification efficiency and affected by the prior experience of processors [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, common methods for identifying effective microseismic signals include parametric analysis, waveform analysis, wavelet transform, pattern recognition, etc. But most of these methods require manual processing, which is subject to the unstable classification efficiency and affected by the prior experience of processors [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the above methods cannot handle the complex DAS background noise. In addition, multi-scale denoising methods use the features of the sparse decomposition results to construct suitable filters for the purpose to suppress the noise to retain the effective signal, and typical methods include wavelet transform filtering (Mousavi et al, 2016;Anvari et al, 2017), Curvelet transform filtering (Neelamani et al, 2008;Gorszczyk et al, 2014), Shearlet transform filtering (Gan et al, 2015;Chen and Fomel 2018), empirical mode decomposition (EMD) (Bekara and van der Baan, 2009;Amezquita Sanchez et al, 2017) and variational modal decomposition (VMD) (Kesharwani et al, 2021). Unfortunately, when dealing with DAS recordings containing complex noise, researchers have difficulty in obtaining optimal filtering parameters, which leads to noise residuals and loss of amplitude of the effective signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, researchers have come up with many methods to suppress random noise. Common methods include predictive filtering (Chen and Ma, 2014;Liu et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2021), mode decomposition (Han and van der Baan, 2015;Gómez and Velis, 2016;Long et al, 2021), low-rank constraints (Anvari et al, 2017;Huang, 2022), and transform domain (Kesharwani et al, 2022;Xie et al, 2022;Zhang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%