2006
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9429(2006)132:4(411)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marine Wastewater Discharges from Multiport Diffusers. IV: Stratified Flowing Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…CorJet predicts the following properties at the terminal layer, using the same transition rules as for the round jet: centerline terminal dilution S t = 1.5( b / * q )F 1/2 a , maximum level of upper plume boundary z max = 2.7 b /F 1/2 a , and terminal level z t = 2.0 b /F 1/2 a . These values can be compared against the data of Tian et al [57] who determined the corresponding coefficients to be 1.23, 2.4 and 1.4, respectively, indicating satisfactory overall agreement for this complex discharge configuration.…”
Section: Multiport Diffuser Flows In Ambient Current Merging Of Multimentioning
confidence: 79%
“…CorJet predicts the following properties at the terminal layer, using the same transition rules as for the round jet: centerline terminal dilution S t = 1.5( b / * q )F 1/2 a , maximum level of upper plume boundary z max = 2.7 b /F 1/2 a , and terminal level z t = 2.0 b /F 1/2 a . These values can be compared against the data of Tian et al [57] who determined the corresponding coefficients to be 1.23, 2.4 and 1.4, respectively, indicating satisfactory overall agreement for this complex discharge configuration.…”
Section: Multiport Diffuser Flows In Ambient Current Merging Of Multimentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For long multiport ocean outfall diffusers, F is one of the most important parameters governing the dynamics and mixing of the flow in the near field. Experiments on diffusers in both unstratified [9,10] and stratified [6,11,12] flows show that for Froude numbers less than about 0.1, the effect of the current on dilution is negligible. As the current speed is increased only slightly ( 0.1) F ≈ the upstream layer is expelled and all of the flow is swept downstream.…”
Section: Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These experiments incorporate the most important hydrodynamic aspects of ocean outfalls, including the effects of arbitrary current speed and direction (including parallel currents), stratification, port spacing, source momentum flux, discharges from both sides of the diffuser and the resulting merging of the plumes from both sides, reentrainment and additional mixing in the spreading layer, direct plume impingement in parallel currents, and lateral gravitational spreading [8]- [12]. In addition to the laboratory data, the model has been validated against other data, including data from the field tracer and laboratory experiments for the San Francisco outfall [13], from the field tests in the Whites Point, Los Angeles outfall [14] and in the Sand Island, Hawaii outfall [15], and more recently from the field tracer of the Boston outfall [16].…”
Section: Modeling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the strength of seawater stratification, currents, and other variables, the horizontal spreading layer may be submerged and will not be visible on the water surface. If the receiving waters are homogeneous or weakly stratified, the plumes will reach the surface and spread horizontally away from the source (Tian et al 2004a, b;Daviero and Roberts 2006;Tian et al 2006;Hunt et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%