2018
DOI: 10.31577/sociologia.2018.50.6.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marital Status, Smoking and Binge Drinking in Comparative Perspective

Abstract: Marital Status, Smoking and Binge Drinking in Comparative Perspective. The paper explores cross-national differences in the link between marital status, smoking and binge drinking. Using the International Social Survey Data (ISSP Health and Health Care) from 2011, it tests whether the gap between married and single individuals depends on the prevalence of the vice in the society. This hypothesis was partly corroborated for binge drinking in both male and female samples though the link between marriage and alco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, we can consider the attitudes of both partners, or we can consider the fact that the relative housework is based on a subjective evaluation of each partner. To account for the interdependence between observations from the same household, we adopted a multilevel mixed-effect approach in Stata 15 (xtmixed, similarly, see Hamplová, 2018). These models treat respondents as nested within the same households and account for the interdependence and similarity between observations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, we can consider the attitudes of both partners, or we can consider the fact that the relative housework is based on a subjective evaluation of each partner. To account for the interdependence between observations from the same household, we adopted a multilevel mixed-effect approach in Stata 15 (xtmixed, similarly, see Hamplová, 2018). These models treat respondents as nested within the same households and account for the interdependence and similarity between observations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%