2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-017-3641-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maritime Continent seasonal climate biases in AMIP experiments of the CMIP5 multimodel ensemble

Abstract: summer monsoon shift, but they overestimate the precipitation; especially during the JJA and SON seasons. Cluster II models simulate weaker seasonal migration than observed, and the maximum rainfall position stays closer to the equator throughout the year. The tropics-wide properties of these clusters suggest a connection between the skill of simulating global properties of the monsoon circulation and the skill of simulating the regional scale of Maritime Continent precipitation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Di Nezio et al () used the CESM model, whose convection scheme relies on Richter and Rasch () for the deep convection and Park and Bretherton () for the shallow convection. These two schemes have been shown to produce lower precipitation rates in the convective area of the Maritime Continent when compared to Emanuel's (Toh et al, ). In the light of our sensitivity tests, we suggest that discrepancies among previous studies and our results regarding the shelf influence on rainfall patterns likely arise from differing parameterizations as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di Nezio et al () used the CESM model, whose convection scheme relies on Richter and Rasch () for the deep convection and Park and Bretherton () for the shallow convection. These two schemes have been shown to produce lower precipitation rates in the convective area of the Maritime Continent when compared to Emanuel's (Toh et al, ). In the light of our sensitivity tests, we suggest that discrepancies among previous studies and our results regarding the shelf influence on rainfall patterns likely arise from differing parameterizations as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure shows that models overpredict precipitation over the western Indian Ocean as well as western Pacific with well‐known double Intertropical Convergence Zone biases (Lin, ). Over the southern MC, weak negative biases are shown in nearly all the models, which are linked to the biases of the local Hadley circulation (Toh et al, ). In summary, models tend to predict excess surface precipitation (except in the southern MC) and have a lower‐tropospheric dry bias over the Indo‐Pacific region.…”
Section: Mjo Processes and Mean Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also reflected in the 850-hPa humidity in WRF and ERA-I (Figures 4 and S5). Despite these processes being related to representation of land and sea areas, the AMIP runs at higher resolution do not appear to have additional skill relative to the coarser models-the lack of sensitivity to model resolution was previously reported with respect to mean rainfall biases in the region (Toh et al, 2017). Thus, the accurate simulation of Maritime Continent rainfall goes well beyond the area averages considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The atmosphere-only (AMIP) model simulations also show large spread and there are consistent biases among some models including underestimates in ACCESS1-0 and MPI-ESM-MR, both of which have negative rainfall biases in the western MC (Toh et al, 2017), and overestimates in MRI-CGCM3. The 11-year WRF simulation-series (Vincent & Lane, 2017a) is more similar to GPCP especially in the first five and last three summers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%