2010
DOI: 10.1002/yea.1831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marker reconstitution mutagenesis: a simple and efficient reverse genetic approach

Abstract: A novel reverse genetic approach termed 'marker reconstitution mutagenesis' was designed to generate mutational allelic series in genes of interest. This approach consists of two simple steps which utilize two selective markers. First, using one selective marker, a partial fragment of another selective marker gene is inserted adjacently to a gene of interest by homologous recombination. Second, random mutations are introduced precisely into the gene of interest, together with the reconstitution of the latter s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cDNAs encoding FP tags can easily be fused to the 3 ′ terminus of a gene at its genomic locus in less than a week via polymerase chain reaction techniques (Wach et al 1997;Bähler et al 1998;Janke et al 2004), whereas recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) and marker switch approaches that take marginally longer support tagging at the amino terminus (MacIver et al 2003;Watson et al 2008;Tang et al 2011). The aim is to support stable expression at wild-type levels, because the single integrated FP-tagged allele remains under the control of the endogenous promoter at the endogenous chromosomal location.…”
Section: Fluorescent Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cDNAs encoding FP tags can easily be fused to the 3 ′ terminus of a gene at its genomic locus in less than a week via polymerase chain reaction techniques (Wach et al 1997;Bähler et al 1998;Janke et al 2004), whereas recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) and marker switch approaches that take marginally longer support tagging at the amino terminus (MacIver et al 2003;Watson et al 2008;Tang et al 2011). The aim is to support stable expression at wild-type levels, because the single integrated FP-tagged allele remains under the control of the endogenous promoter at the endogenous chromosomal location.…”
Section: Fluorescent Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marker reconstitution mutagenesis was used to screen for mutants as described by Tang et al (2011). First, a fusion PCR fragment was amplified using four primers (GGCGGA GATATC GTTTTC TTGCTC TGTTTT C, GGTACC ACCAGC TGAAGA TGATAC AACTCT AC, CATCTT CAGCTG GTGGTA CCACTA TGTATC, and GCTATA CGATAT CCAGAT CTACCC AAAGTT CCTCAT GAG, as p1, p2, p3, and p4, respectively), digested with BglII and EcoRV, and then subcloned into the NruI-BglII site of p208H5cdU4 + , generating p208-act1.…”
Section: Mutagenesis Of Act1 +mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To isolate an allelic series of actin mutants in fission yeast, we performed a screen using marker reconstitution mutagenesis (Tang et al 2011), a novel and highly efficient reverse genetics approach. As shown in Figure 1A, a mutagenic PCR fragment of act1-his5c (the whole act1 + gene and the C-terminal part of the his5 + gene) was transformed into a strain with an integrated his5cD fragment (a fragment of his5 + with a 50-bp C-terminal part truncation) adjacent to the endogenous act1 + locus.…”
Section: Actin Mutant Screen Using Marker Reconstitution Mutagenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations