2015
DOI: 10.3732/apps.1400115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MarkerMiner 1.0: A new application for phylogenetic marker development using angiosperm transcriptomes

Abstract: Premise of the study:Targeted sequencing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms offers enormous potential for plant systematics by enabling economical acquisition of multilocus data sets that can resolve difficult phylogenetic problems. However, because discovery of single-copy nuclear (SCN) loci from NGS data requires both bioinformatics skills and access to high-performance computing resources, the application of NGS data has been limited.Methods and Results:We developed MarkerMiner 1.0, a fully au… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
152
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MarkerMiner then performs reciprocal BLAST analyses between the latter putative ortholog pairs and a set of user‐specified LSCN gene references ( Oryza and Xerophyta in our case) as a final filter to only retain putative ortholog pairs with putative low‐ to single‐copy status. MarkerMiner only reports the top scoring transcripts from the latter BLAST analyses as putatively orthologous LSCN genes; if additional hits are obtained, these are reported as “secondary transcripts” that may represent splice isoforms, putative paralogs, or partially assembled transcripts, all of which we did not consider for bait design (see Chamala et al., for a complete algorithm). We added Xerophyta as a reference taxon in MarkerMiner, using procedures outlined in Johnson () to create relevant reference files, one containing nucleotide sequences for all genes with introns masked as Ns, and another containing their translation into amino acids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MarkerMiner then performs reciprocal BLAST analyses between the latter putative ortholog pairs and a set of user‐specified LSCN gene references ( Oryza and Xerophyta in our case) as a final filter to only retain putative ortholog pairs with putative low‐ to single‐copy status. MarkerMiner only reports the top scoring transcripts from the latter BLAST analyses as putatively orthologous LSCN genes; if additional hits are obtained, these are reported as “secondary transcripts” that may represent splice isoforms, putative paralogs, or partially assembled transcripts, all of which we did not consider for bait design (see Chamala et al., for a complete algorithm). We added Xerophyta as a reference taxon in MarkerMiner, using procedures outlined in Johnson () to create relevant reference files, one containing nucleotide sequences for all genes with introns masked as Ns, and another containing their translation into amino acids.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One disadvantage of the transcriptome‐only approach to probe design is that probes spanning intron boundaries will not be effective during sequence capture. Identification of intron‐exon boundaries is possible using MarkerMiner (Chamala et al., ), which aligns transcriptome data to reference genome sequences and returns intron‐masked multiple‐sequence alignments. If no reference genome is available, a low‐coverage genome sequence (10–15× coverage) can also be used to design probes around intron boundaries (Gardner et al., ).…”
Section: Target Enrichmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) and putative single‐copy loci from plant transcriptomes ( markerminer , Chamala et al . ). The challenge of developing new phylogenetic markers lies both in the discovery of conserved regions, the design of primer pairs and an estimation of the level of their phylogenetic signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%