2000
DOI: 10.1006/jfin.2000.0287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Discipline and Incentive Problems in Conglomerate Firms with Applications to Banking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
80
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, that stability of the banks has an inverse relationship. This result deviate from most literature (Bourgain et al;2012, Nier and Baumann;2006 and Boot and Schmeits;2000) but may agree with Barth and Landsman (2010) who propose that the necessary requirement for bank stability may transcend or not be the same as requirement for quality accounting standard. Also the level of the financial market efficiency in Africa may have led to the result.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, that stability of the banks has an inverse relationship. This result deviate from most literature (Bourgain et al;2012, Nier and Baumann;2006 and Boot and Schmeits;2000) but may agree with Barth and Landsman (2010) who propose that the necessary requirement for bank stability may transcend or not be the same as requirement for quality accounting standard. Also the level of the financial market efficiency in Africa may have led to the result.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultscontrasting
confidence: 92%
“…Branching, entry, and asset investment restrictions often encourage focus, while supervisors tend to encourage diversification to reduce risks. 2 On the other side, proponents of focus argue that diversified banks can suffer from diluting the comparative advantage of management by going beyond their existing expertise (Klein and Saidenberg (1998)), diversification-inducing competition (Winton (1999)), and increased agency costs resulting from value-decreasing activities of 2 Diversified financial institutions may also reduce the expected costs of financial distress or bankruptcy by lowering risks through spreading operations across different products or economic environments (Boot and Schmeits (2000)). In addition, geographically diversified firms may obtain tax benefits by transferring income from high tax areas to low tax areas (Iskandar-Datta and McLaughlin (2005)).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boot and Schmeits (1998) study this decision. They characterize the conglomeration decision as a tradeoff between the risk-reduction benefit of diversification and the cost of weaker incentives.…”
Section: Risk Management Information Systems and The Organization Of mentioning
confidence: 99%