2006
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhl031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Discipline and Internal Governance in the Mutual Fund Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

12
51
0
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
12
51
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, while winner funds suffer from fund inflows irrespective of what happens to the manager, the performance of loser funds is only affected when both mechanisms operate together. Further, we confirm the prediction in Dangl et al (2008) that, prior to a manager change, fund risk increases, but falls post-replacement.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, while winner funds suffer from fund inflows irrespective of what happens to the manager, the performance of loser funds is only affected when both mechanisms operate together. Further, we confirm the prediction in Dangl et al (2008) that, prior to a manager change, fund risk increases, but falls post-replacement.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For loser funds, as predicted by Dangl et al (2008), we also detect a strong interaction effect between both mechanisms. Manager changes, interpreted as an "internal governance" mechanism, and outflows, treated as an "external governance" mechanism, reinforce each other and the combined effect is a 0.16 percentage points per month (1.92 percentage points per annum) higher risk-adjusted performance for loser funds experiencing both forms of governance relative to funds experiencing neither.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations