2020
DOI: 10.1017/s1744137420000405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market dominance and endogenous decline: the contribution of historical analysis

Abstract: The advances in economic and social history over the past years enabled me to empirically test assumptions about the long-run development of markets. The review by Geoff Hodgson of the resulting book, The Invisible Hand?, is lucid but incomplete. I argue that the rise to dominance of factor markets, followed by that of financial markets, took place already in several early cases, and that all market economies, through an endogenous process, saw the accumulation of wealth and, next, the translation of this weal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He theorized them in publications initially rejected by the profession but are now widely celebrated across ideological lines. Complexity, evolutionary, and institutional economists are particularly fond of studying formation in recent literature (Brette and Chassagnon, 2021; Choi and Storr, 2022; Van Bavel, 2020).…”
Section: Economics In Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He theorized them in publications initially rejected by the profession but are now widely celebrated across ideological lines. Complexity, evolutionary, and institutional economists are particularly fond of studying formation in recent literature (Brette and Chassagnon, 2021; Choi and Storr, 2022; Van Bavel, 2020).…”
Section: Economics In Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%