Market dynamics of harm and labour exploitation

Davies, Jonathan

doi:10.32631/ccc19.06

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Labor exploitation is infused with moral and legal ambiguity, as there are blurred boundaries between those who can and cannot be identified as a victim (Charman 2019;Davies 2019;Farrell, Pfeffer, and Bright 2015;Van Meeteren and Wiering 2019). In the past decennia various international and national legal frameworks have been installed that all consider serious labor exploitation as a form of human trafficking, but stipulate different conditions for victimhood.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who is the (“Ideal”) Victim of Labor Exploitation? Two Qualitative Vignette Studies on Labor Inspectors’ Discretion

Loyens

Paraciani

2021

The Sociological Quarterly

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper analyzes how labor inspectors deal with ambiguous legal boundaries between those who can and who cannot be identified as a labor exploitation victim. Street-level bureaucracy research has largely overlooked how frontline officers deal with victims. We combine the street-level bureaucracy framework with insights from symbolic interactionism and criminology about 'ideal/iconic victims' to explain how inspectors use heuristics based on societal norms about victimhood to deal with legal ambiguity when dealing with potential labor exploitation cases. Using qualitative vignette studies in Belgium and the Netherlands, our results show that the perceived vulnerability and blamelessness of employees have a crucial role in inspectors' assessment of who is and is not a labor exploitation victim. More specifically, migrant workers are seen as more vulnerable than native workers, particularly if they are female, and perceived complicity of social fraud reduces the chance that workers are seen as exploitation victims. Furthermore, also perceived employer characteristics have a role in case assessment. Our findings thus show that within the context of legal ambiguity, labor inspectors use stereotypical societal victim perceptions as heuristics, which can result in legal uncertainty and the risk that those suffering exploitations do not receive the support they need.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%