2018
DOI: 10.3386/w24938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Expanding or Market Stealing? Competition with Network Effects in BikeSharing

Abstract: and conference attendants at the NBER IO conference, the HBS Platform Strategy Conference, and the NBER workshop on Electric and Autonomous Vehicles. All errors are ours. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publicatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, a series of papers study different aspects of efficiency in urban transportation; for instance, Shapiro (2018) and Liu et al (2019) explore the welfare improvements from different centralizing formats; Ghili and Kumar (2020) investigate demand and supply imbalances in ride-sharing platforms; Ostrovsky and Schwarz (2018) focus on carpooling and self-driving cars; Kreindler (2020) studies optimal congestion pricing; Cao et al (2018) explore competition in bike-sharing platforms; while several papers study platform pricing (e.g. Bian, 2020, Ma et al, 2018, Castillo, 2019.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a series of papers study different aspects of efficiency in urban transportation; for instance, Shapiro (2018) and Liu et al (2019) explore the welfare improvements from different centralizing formats; Ghili and Kumar (2020) investigate demand and supply imbalances in ride-sharing platforms; Ostrovsky and Schwarz (2018) focus on carpooling and self-driving cars; Kreindler (2020) studies optimal congestion pricing; Cao et al (2018) explore competition in bike-sharing platforms; while several papers study platform pricing (e.g. Bian, 2020, Ma et al, 2018, Castillo, 2019.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Reshef (2019) documents that the entry of new restaurants on a food delivery platform increases the performance of high-quality incumbent businesses, because consumers have more options to choose from on the platform, while hurting low-quality incumbent businesses. Furthermore, Cao et al (2018) show that entrants expand market demand for incumbents due to the network effect in the bike-sharing industry in China. Shen and Xiao (2014) and Yang (2019) study the learning effect of observing competitors' entry in the fast food industry.…”
Section: Related Literature and Contributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceived entertainment in bike sharing is defined as the pleasure and relaxation enjoyed by users while using bike-sharing services, not just solving travel difficulties ( Venkatesh et al, 2012 ). To expand new users and keep regular users operators launch creative activities to grow entertainment, such as “Free Riding Day” activities, which enrich users’ consumption experience and add entertainment value ( Cao et al, 2018 ). According to the intrinsic motivation theory, perceived entertainment is considered as an internal motive for evoking a behavior ( Davis et al, 1992 ; Lee et al, 2005 ).…”
Section: Overview Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%