Market integration and price transmission in Indian shrimp exports

Singh, Naorem Dinesh; Krishnan, M.; Sivaramane, N.; Ramasubramanian, V.; Kiresur, V.R.

doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738687

Cited by 5 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…India's aquaculture development has focused on national programs and policy driven by private sector initiatives and enterprises. Shrimp is the most important seafood export commodity from India and the largest shrimp exporter to the US (Singh et al, 2022). It contributes 66% in value and 39% in quantity in total seafood exports from India (Sarada et al, 2006; Singh et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Shrimp is the most important seafood export commodity from India and the largest shrimp exporter to the US (Singh et al, 2022). It contributes 66% in value and 39% in quantity in total seafood exports from India (Sarada et al, 2006; Singh et al, 2022). India with an export volume of 43.85 million tonnes registering a 14.5% growth over 2015 was among the top five shrimp exporters in the international market in 2016 (Singh et al, 2022).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It contributes 66% in value and 39% in quantity in total seafood exports from India (Sarada et al, 2006; Singh et al, 2022). India with an export volume of 43.85 million tonnes registering a 14.5% growth over 2015 was among the top five shrimp exporters in the international market in 2016 (Singh et al, 2022). The shrimp culture industry in India in the last two decades contributed to foreign exchange earnings, which are directed to rural economic development.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Dynamics of aquaculture governance

Jolly

Nyandat²,

Yang

et al. 2023

J World Aquaculture Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aquaculture is a growing industry with an annual growth rate that is far superior to the population growth rate. Most production occurs in lower‐ and middle‐income countries, and therefore, they can improve the efficiency and modernize the production systems to increase exports to earn foreign exchange earnings for economic and social development. The institutional arrangements should be part of the mechanisms that ensure sustainable aquaculture growth, through the participation of all stakeholders. Sustainability is possible with good and dynamic governance through which the industry embraces the basic principles of governance, equity, accountability, efficiency, and predictability. Over the past decade, several countries made changes in governance and implemented regulations through their action plans to improve aquaculture productivity, and stakeholders profited from the changes made along the value chain. For the producers to benefit from the value‐added products, they complied with the regulations imposed by the importing countries, international regulatory bodies, or their own consumers. Standards increased, and the implementation of certification resulted in changes in the industrial structure. These standards, which inflict regulatory cost on producers, stimulated an improvement in productivity and product quality. However, during the last decade, production growth declined from 5.8% from 2001 to 2010 to 4.5% from 2011 to 2018, resulting in the elusive realization of the potential of meeting the sustainable development targets. There is a need for a paradigm shift that encourages small‐scale producers to engage in sustainable intensive aquaculture. The challenge is, therefore, to move toward production intensification and expansion, and the harmonization of national and international regulations to ensure the supply of safe and adequate fish to consumers, while maintaining a sustainable production system, and at the same time conserving the environment and maintaining social and economic stability. With good governance and political will, the social, economic, and environmental objectives for attaining the Sustainable Development Goals during the period 2020–2030 are possible if governments integrate sustainable aquaculture developments within an expanded aquatic and terrestrial food security policy framework using systems thinking and open innovation approaches.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Dynamics of aquaculture governance

Jolly

Nyandat²,

Yang

et al. 2023

J World Aquaculture Soc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Compound annual growth is the average growth experienced over recorded periods of more than one year, unlike simple growth which is not characterized by the compounding of rates from base values [20]. It is used to calculate growth rates of area, production and yield over defined periods.…”

Section: Analysis Of Compound Annual Growth Rate (Cagr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is used to calculate growth rates of area, production and yield over defined periods. The compound growth model was estimated on the basis of the exponential growth equation expressed as in equation ( 1) [20,21]:…”

Section: Analysis Of Compound Annual Growth Rate (Cagr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the Sustainability and Growth Dynamics of Shrimp Aquaculture in Odisha, India: A Decomposition Approach

Tripathy,

Prakash,

et al. 2024

JSRR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we examine the growth and decomposition trends of the area, production, and yield of the shrimp aquaculture sector in Odisha. We use annual time series data for the period 2010–11 to 2022–23, and with the help of exponential function, we evaluate growth rate and trend. CV and CDVI were used to analyze production instability. Minha’s decomposition model was used to evaluate the contributions of area and yield to change in farm production. Our findings show a commendably high compound growth rate of 11.55 per cent for area, 26.12 per cent for production, and 13.06 per cent for yield. The instability index, CV and CDVI of the area are low. The influence of the area, yield, and interaction effects accounted for 26.35 per cent, 22.18 per cent, and 51.47 per cent, respectively, of shrimp production. The analysis of decomposition and area effect stresses the need to understand shrimp production dynamics in Odisha. Monitoring land use patterns and markets and promoting research and innovation is not only securing sustainability, nutritional security, and employment but also the economic development of the state.

show abstract