Market power, scale economy and productivity: the case of China’s food and tobacco industry

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to measure and examine the relationships between market power, scale economy and productivity for several important food and tobacco industries in China. Design/methodology/approach The model applied in this paper is based on Hall’s framework (Hall, 1988, 1990) and Klette (1999). The paper relaxes the assumption of constant returns to scale, and estimates market power and rate of returns to scale simultaneously, and then employs a covariance approach to examine the relationship between market power, scale economy and productivity via an unbalanced panel data at firm level. Findings Empirical results indicate that all the selected seven food industries are characterized with significant market power, especially for China’s cigarette industry whose markup is as almost five times as the smallest one. In addition, China’s soybean and cigarette sectors are manifested to have scale economy, with return to scale being larger than 1, while the other five sectors are proved to have decreasing returns to scale. Empirical results also provide evidence to support significant negative correlations between market power and scale economy in all sectors, and negative correlations between market power and productivity in most of the selected sectors. While more heterogeneous relationship between scale economy and productivity are found across the selected sectors. Originality/value This paper contributes to examine the relationship between market power, scale economy and productivity empirically for Chinese food manufacturers using a firm-level unbalanced panel data. Results which coincide well with the reality provide policy implication on understanding the situation of market structure for China’s food and tobacco industry.

Market power and allocative efficiency loss: a comparative analysis on China's tobacco and food industries

“…As shown in the sixth column of Table 2, China's tobacco manufacturers are characterized as the strongest market power in the selected sectors, with an average Lerner Index as high as 0.82. This estimation result is nearly the same as that for China's tobacco industry through the Hall's framework (Dai et al , 2018) but relatively larger than that for the US cigarette using both the NEIO (e.g. Bhuyan and Lopez, 1998) and Solow Residual-based models (e.g.…”

Ramifications of Households’ Nonfarm Income on Agricultural Productivity: Evidence From a Rural Area of Pakistan

“…For many years, Pakistan's rural economy has relied mostly on the agricultural sector, but the situation is currently changing. Agricultural and technological development increase production but need to address the income gap (Dai et al, 2018). The income gap between nonfarm households and farm households is widening daily, as stated by Chang and Boisvert (2009).…”

Estimating market power in the Chinese pork-packing industry: a structural approach

“…Recent studies have provided informal evidence regarding inefficiency in the Chinese pork industry. This includes discussion and examination of economies of scale regarding concentration in the middle of pork supply chain (Weldegebriel et al , 2012; Dai et al , 2018; Ma et al , 2019), incomplete and asymmetric pork-hog price transmission (e.g. Guo, 2011; Pan and Li, 2015) and market power in international pork markets (e.g.…”

“…The presence of market power is most often a characteristic of mature oligopolistic industries, where demand is relatively stable, the rate of innovation is minimal to moderate, and economies of scale – and therefore consolidation – offer the most promising source of increasing revenue and profits (Howard, 2016). While the Chinese pork industry is still underdeveloped, most of these characteristics have already been observed and discussed in the literature (Weldegebriel et al , 2012; Wang et al , 2014; Guo et al , 2016; Chen and Yu, 2018; Dai et al , 2018; Ma et al , 2019). Nonetheless, questions remain unanswered regarding the interplay between the pork and hog industries.…”