Market reactions to non‐market strategy: Congressional testimony as an indicator of firm political influence

Abstract

Research Summary: We argue that because influence in the political arena can net benefits for firms, investors will respond favorably to indications of firm political influence. We focus on testimony before Congress because it is one of the most highly sought after and influential points of governmental access. Our findings indicate that firms reap positive abnormal returns surrounding Congressional testimony and that investors respond more favorably to aspects of testimony that indicate additional political influence (i.e., witness status, testimony length, and committee jurisdiction). Further, we find regulatory risk strengthens the effect of witness status and testimony length while Congressional negativity strengthens the effect of witness status. Taken together, our results suggest that investors respond favorably to indications that firms have influence in the political arena. Managerial Summary: Our findings showcase that investors react positively to firm Congressional testimonies and their attributes, such as the status of a firm representative, the length of the testimony, and the committee industry jurisdiction. Further, we also find that investors will respond even more positively to these Congressional testimony attributes when a firm is facing high regulatory risk and when the Congressional representative's tone is negative. In general, our findings suggest that firms may gain

The nasty face of the liability of foreignness: MNCs and rent extraction

“…The need to manage the liabilities arising from the host country’s political environment coupled with financial markets’ increasing attention to MNCs’ success in mitigating those liabilities (Ridge et al , 2019), and make it essential for managers to understand the factors that will help reduce the power imbalance between the parties, as well as factors that would constrain the abuse of power by their political counterparts to extract rents.…”

Perceptions of political Self‐Dealing? An empirical investigation of market returns surrounding the disclosure of politician stock purchases

“…Congress divides labor by appointing members to certain committees so that those members can obtain detailed information about the regulatory landscape of an industry, create and pass legislation focused on those industries, and generally become experts regarding that industry. As Ridge et al (2019) note, the "jurisdiction of committees encourages members of each committee to develop a specialized knowledge of the committee's subject matter…and then use that knowledge to draft public policy regarding the industry over which their jurisdiction presides" (p. 1649).…”

“…Further, firms that testify at committee hearings are generally firms "with long-term and ongoing relational ties to committee members" (Ridge et al, 2019(Ridge et al, , p. 1646. This is because testimonies involve extensive coordination between the firm and the committee, including private meetings where more information is exchanged than in the public hearing itself.…”

Combining Multiple Organizational-level Databases: An Empirical Evaluation of Different Matching Methods

“…The check of the studies in the SMJ confirms that also in 2019, multiple secondary databases are frequently combined and that the vast majority of the studies do not report in detail on the method(s) utilized to combine the data (e.g., Aggarwal 2020; Arikan, Arikan, and Shenkar 2020; Graffin et al 2020). The studies that do describe the MM show that name MMs are utilized (e.g., Cao, Gustafson, and Velthuis 2019; Hendricks, Howell, and Bingham 2019) as well as common identifiers methods (e.g., Kang and Kim 2020; Meyer-Doyle, Lee, and Helfat 2019), and fuzzy name/key word methods (e.g., Png 2019; Ridge et al 2019). The work by Png (2019) describes the development of a new data set and could be considered as a good example of describing the MM.…”