1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1007704811420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market Share Dispersion Among Leading Firms as a Determinant of Advertising Intensity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the GAO ͑2003, 2008͒ studies only consider the impact of consolidation based on overall market concentration and do not examine whether consolidation impacts how equally divided market shares are among leading firms pre-and post-consolidation. We examine market equality based on evidence from industrial organization research that suggests equality of market shares among the largest suppliers, in addition to market concentration, can impact competition ͑e.g., Willis and Rogers 1998;Schmalensee 1989͒. In addition, there is indirect evidence in the auditing literature that unequal market shares can impact competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the GAO ͑2003, 2008͒ studies only consider the impact of consolidation based on overall market concentration and do not examine whether consolidation impacts how equally divided market shares are among leading firms pre-and post-consolidation. We examine market equality based on evidence from industrial organization research that suggests equality of market shares among the largest suppliers, in addition to market concentration, can impact competition ͑e.g., Willis and Rogers 1998;Schmalensee 1989͒. In addition, there is indirect evidence in the auditing literature that unequal market shares can impact competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies argue that CSR activities positively affect brand equity and advertising intensity [41][42][43], implying that there is a concern about reverse causation under which firms with high CSR activities are more likely to spend advertising expenditures. Following Willis and Rogers [44], the authors regress the first stage model as: ADV = a 0 + a 1 PCM + a 2 HHI + a 3 SIZE + a 4 GROW + e…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These activities, however, do not per se systematically affect the profitability, as the positive and synergic effects of mergers and acquisitions are not guaranteed (Cascorbi, 2003). Market size (S) was used as an instrument for advertising intensity, following the reasoning of Willis and Rogers (1998) that it could determine advertising intensity. The variable was not found to be statistically related to market profitability in our sample.…”
Section: Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%