2016
DOI: 10.1111/twec.12420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Market‐specific Sunk Export Costs: The Impact of Learning and Spillovers

Abstract: Firms may face sunk costs when entering an export market. Previous studies have focused on global or country‐specific sunk export costs. This study analyses the importance of market‐specific sunk export costs (defining ‘market’ as a product–country combination). We also study how market‐specific export costs can be affected by various kinds of learning and spillover effects. We use firm‐level panel data for Norwegian seafood exports distributed on products and countries. The results lend support to the hypothe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In referring here to costs being partially sunk on a market‐by‐market basis, we have quite a different model in mind than the well‐known sunk costs model of Roberts and Tybout () which describes sunk costs relating to entering and exiting exporting altogether. A number of recent papers have looked at this issue of entry or fixed costs being market specific such as Gullstrand (), Meinen () and Maurseth and Medin (). Each of these papers have found evidence of market‐specific sunk costs and that these may be affected by the firm's level of wider export experience and access to information channels about the market.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Exporting At the Firm Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In referring here to costs being partially sunk on a market‐by‐market basis, we have quite a different model in mind than the well‐known sunk costs model of Roberts and Tybout () which describes sunk costs relating to entering and exiting exporting altogether. A number of recent papers have looked at this issue of entry or fixed costs being market specific such as Gullstrand (), Meinen () and Maurseth and Medin (). Each of these papers have found evidence of market‐specific sunk costs and that these may be affected by the firm's level of wider export experience and access to information channels about the market.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Exporting At the Firm Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature has looked primarily into marketing costs (e.g., Arkolakis ; Irarrazabal, Moxnes, and Opromolla 2010; Eaton, Kortum, and Kramarz ), but has paid less attention to FECs. Available studies infer the existence of FECs from choices about export behavior (Roberts and Tybout ; Das, Roberts, and Tybout ; Hanson and Xiang ; Maurseth and Medin ). Helpman, Melitz, and Rubinstein () analyze bilateral aggregate trade statistics, taking FECs as a confounding factor to control for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument in favor of self-selection relates to the additional costs of exporting. Entering export markets involves sunk costs linked to obtaining knowledge of foreign markets, the screening of potential customers, the set-up of foreign distribution channels and the adoption of products and services to the local needs and tastes (Kneller and Pisu 2007;Maurseth and Medin 2016). These costs act as an entry barrier, preventing less productive firms from exporting.…”
Section: International Trade and Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%