Market Timing and Capital Structure

Abstract

It is well known that firms are more likely to issue equity when their market values are high, relative to book and past market values, and to repurchase equity when their market values are low. We document that the resulting effects on capital structure are very persistent. As a consequence, current capital structure is strongly related to historical market values. The results suggest the theory that capital structure is the cumulative outcome of past attempts to time the equity market.IN CORPORATE F INANCE, "equity market timing" refers to the practice of issuing shares at high prices and repurchasing at low prices. The intention is to exploit temporary f luctuations in the cost of equity relative to the cost of other forms of capital. In the efficient and integrated capital markets studied by Modigliani and Miller~1958!, the costs of different forms of capital do not vary independently, so there is no gain from opportunistically switching between equity and debt. In capital markets that are inefficient or segmented, by contrast, market timing benefits ongoing shareholders at the expense of entering and exiting ones. Managers thus have incentives to time the market if they think it is possible and if they care more about ongoing shareholders.In practice, equity market timing appears to be an important aspect of real corporate financial policy. There is evidence for market timing in four different kinds of studies. First, analyses of actual financing decisions show that firms tend to issue equity instead of debt when market value is high, relative to book value and past market values, and tend to repurchase equity when market value is low. 1 Second, analyses of long-run stock returns fol- 1 lowing corporate finance decisions suggest that equity market timing is successful on average. Firms issue equity when the cost of equity is relatively low and repurchase equity when the cost is relatively high. 2 Third, analyses of earnings forecasts and realizations around equity issues suggest that firms tend to issue equity at times when investors are rather too enthusiastic about earnings prospects. 3 Fourth, and perhaps most convincing, managers admit to market timing in anonymous surveys. Graham and Harvey~2001! find that two-thirds of CFOs agree that "the amount by which our stock is undervalued or overvalued was an important or very important consideration" in issuing equity, and nearly as many agree that "if our stock price has recently risen, the price at which we can sell is 'high'"~p. 216!. In that survey as a whole, equity market prices are regarded as more important than 9 out of 10 other factors considered in the decision to issue common stock, and more important than all 4 other factors considered in the decision to issue convertible debt.In this paper, we ask how equity market timing affects capital structure. The basic question is whether market timing has a short-run or a long-run impact. One expects at least a mechanical, short-run impact. However, if firms subsequently rebalance away the inf lue...

Capital Structure Decisions in Family Firms - Empirical Evidence from a Bank-Based Economy

“…14 By applying such a broad definition of leverage we follow several other studies on capital structure (e.g. Rajan and Zingales 1995, Fama and French 2002, Baker and Wurgler 2002or Kayhan and Titman 2007. Moreover, just recently Elsas and Florysiak (2008) have applied similar definitions of leverage for a large sample study of capital structure in the German environment.…”

Determinants of Capital Structure and Speed of Adjustment: Evidence from Iran and Australia

“…It also suggests that companies, instead of having a precise target leverage, allow the leverage ratio to change in a domain (Dang, 2013). The speed of adjustment has important implications for the company for two reasons; First, since companies are active in the imperfect capital market and face with the problem of information asymmetry (Myers and Majluf, 1984) and the shock of a market such as credit limited (Baker and Wurgler, 2002) temporarily diverge from target leverage. Second, due to the cost of adjustments (such as transaction costs, legal and bank fees), companies cannot quickly offset the divergence from the target leverage (Supra et al, 2016).…”

The Consideration and Purpose of Borrowing: An Empirical Evidence From Indonesia Listed Companies

“…The other works, Myers (1984), added these relationship with growth and tangibility, while Mohamad and Abdullah (2012) and also Chen (2004) added with size. We noticed of some works about relationship debt, profitability and growth (San and Heng, 2011), relationship of debt and profitability (Nadaraja et al, 2011;Ahmadinia et al, 2012;Shubita and Alsawalhah, 2012;Ching et al, 2011;Frank and Goyal, 2003), relationship of debt, growth and size (Homaifar et al, 1994), relationship of debt, size and tangibility (Shamshur, 2010), relationship of debt, growth, size and tangibility (Shah and Khan, 2007;Lim et al, 2012), relationship of profitability, growth and business risk (Lev, 1974), relationship of debt and growth (Sunder and Myers, 1999;Baker and Wurgler, 2002) and the relationship of debt, size, bankruptcy risk and tangibility (Marsh, 1982).…”