2021
DOI: 10.1177/00222429211003560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing Ideas: How to Write Research Articles that Readers Understand and Cite

Abstract: Academia is a marketplace of ideas. Just as firms market their products with packaging and advertising, scholars market their ideas with writing. Even the best ideas will make an impact only if others understand and build upon them. Why, then, is academic writing often difficult to understand? By conducting two experiments and analyzing the text of 1640 articles in premier marketing journals, we show that scholars write unclearly in part because they forget that they know more about their research than readers… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The second driver is accessibility: how effectively a publication communicates its message to the intended audience. Many scholars have noted that insightful ideas may go unnoticed if obscured by complicated communication (e.g., Stremersch et al, 2007;Houston, 2019;Warren et al, 2021), and our own experiences of the review processes of various journals confirm this view.…”
Section: Drivers Of Impactmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The second driver is accessibility: how effectively a publication communicates its message to the intended audience. Many scholars have noted that insightful ideas may go unnoticed if obscured by complicated communication (e.g., Stremersch et al, 2007;Houston, 2019;Warren et al, 2021), and our own experiences of the review processes of various journals confirm this view.…”
Section: Drivers Of Impactmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Several authors have noted that, over time, marketing articles have become increasingly complex and difficult to read because of how they use language (e.g., Brown et al, 2005;Key et al, 2020). In this regard, Warren et al (2021) referred to the "curse of knowledge," as researchers' familiarity with their own field prompts them to adopt a more abstract, technical, and passive writing style that makes the message more difficult to understand. This in turn hampers impact because a text that obscures insights rather than illuminating them is likely to be ignored (Houston, 2019).…”
Section: Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other important indicators may include how often an article is cited, whether it is widely shared (e.g., because it provides a critical theoretical, substantive, or methodological contribution), and whether it is intellectually stimulating and inspiring to read. We therefore propose that scholars assess the relationship of the R2M Index to other article measures such as citation counts, altmetrics, and writing-clarity measures (Warren et al 2021). Most importantly, topical and timely relevance are distinct from business impact.…”
Section: Final Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%