Marketing in the late Soviet garment industry

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to study the Soviet state-owned enterprises that were producing ready to wear clothes, engaged in activities that are traditionally associated with “capitalist” marketing and public relations. Particularly, they responded to consumer complaints, monitored customer satisfaction and changed their product features and offer in response to customer feedback. This claim is illustrated using the example of the garment industry in the city Perm. Design/methodology/approach The data comes from archival research of a range of sector-wide documents of the Soviet period available in the State Archive of Perm Region and from in-depth interviews with ex-employees of Perm Clothing Design House. Findings The paper demonstrates the emergence of a marketing system not only in Eastern European countries and in major Soviet cities but also in a provincial closed city of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic. The findings of the research highlight that the level of sales was important for all the participants in the focal marketing system. Late Soviet marketing had the social function of supporting cooperative relationships between citizens and the state by channeling dissatisfaction and anger through surveys and consumer conferences. Originality/value Previous studies undertaken at the top level of the Soviet managerial pyramid have not represented a detailed picture of routine marketing activities during Late Socialism.

The role of the state in consumer culture: the case of “Operation Vin” in Sweden

“…First, our research has identified two simultaneous lines of actions, framing and settlement, through which the governance unit was able to exploit its social skills to induce other actors to cooperate in the refashioning of the field and in accepting the new cultural order based on wine. In this capacity, the case of Operation Vin shares some important similarities with previous studies illustrating the existence of a marketing system in fields traditionally dominated by the direct intervention of the state (Tadajewski and Stole, 2016; Papushina, 2020) or in which the state has adopted marketing practices to stimulate consumption (e.g. Minowa and Witkowski, 2009; Carpenter and Luciano, 2021).…”

“…In the ancient era, it is well documented that the state played a primary role in fostering consumerism by building infrastructure to promote domestic demand for products (Minowa and Witkowski, 2009) or leisure activities (Karababa and Ger, 2011). Other studies have focused on totalitarian regimes, such as the Soviet Union, to illustrate the emergence of a marketing system to direct consumption for ideological purposes (Tadajewski and Stole, 2016; Papushina, 2020; Dufek, 2021). During other historical periods, the state may be driven by forces of globalization to embrace marketing practices to meet consumer culture preferences (Carpenter and Luciano, 2021).…”

Look up! Five research proposals for rethinking marketing in a post-growth society

“…Marketing research has indeed amassed a wealth of knowledge regarding consumer behavior, the effectiveness of communication techniques, logistical flows, distribution networks, and the workings of the commercial world. Numerous studies have allowed us to critically assess past state-led planning experiences (Gao, 2018; Papushina, 2020). This knowledge could be mobilized to conceptualize and highlight sustainable alternatives to the current economic order.…”

Look up! Cinq propositions de recherche pour repenser le marketing dans une société post-croissance

“…La recherche en marketing a en effet accumulé d’immenses connaissances sur le comportement des consommateurs, l’efficacité des techniques de communication, les flux logistiques, les réseaux de distribution et le fonctionnement du monde commercial. De nombreuses études également ont permis d’évaluer de manière critique les expériences passées de planification dirigée par l’Etat (Gao, 2018 ; Papushina, 2020). Ces connaissances pourraient être mobilisées pour conceptualiser et mettre en évidence des alternatives durables à l’ordre économique actuel, ce qui suppose aussi de repenser le marketing en dehors des cadres du libre marché et de l’économie capitaliste, en délaissant la perspective gestionnaire pour l’orientation politique et l’action publique.…”