2014
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0424.12067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing Midwives in Seventeenth‐Century London: A Re‐examination of Jane Sharp's The Midwives Book

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 Jane Sharp is generally believed to be the first woman/midwife to write an Englishlanguage midwifery text, The Midwives Book of 1671, although compared to Bourgeois and Siegemund, very little is known about Sharp biographically (Hobby 1999); this has led some scholars to go so far as to claim that Sharp wasn't a woman at all, but rather a male author writing with a female pseudonym to increase the marketability of his text (Walsh 2014;but cf. Hobby 1999).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Jane Sharp is generally believed to be the first woman/midwife to write an Englishlanguage midwifery text, The Midwives Book of 1671, although compared to Bourgeois and Siegemund, very little is known about Sharp biographically (Hobby 1999); this has led some scholars to go so far as to claim that Sharp wasn't a woman at all, but rather a male author writing with a female pseudonym to increase the marketability of his text (Walsh 2014;but cf. Hobby 1999).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were repeatedly prohibited [31,34]. It is difficult to tell how long MS. 632 was in use: was it stored quietly away during the Dissolution?…”
Section: History Of the Birth Rollmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, during the Reformation, power fluctuated between Protestant and Catholic monarchs, with each monarch also influencing birthing practices [ 31 ]. While certain medieval items, such as the Eagle Stone, increased in popularity as a birthing remedy in Early Modern England, birth girdles, over time, were repeatedly prohibited [ 31 , 34 ]. It is difficult to tell how long MS. 632 was in use: was it stored quietly away during the Dissolution?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%