1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4359(99)00017-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketing program planning, process benefits, and store performance: An initial study among small retail firms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, what is the role of planning process design in aiding or hindering effective plan implementation? Conant and White (1999) find that marketing planning processes that develop a clear sense of the firm's marketing strengths and weaknesses are connected with greater follow through on marketing program plans. Coupled with our results concerning the role of marketing capabilities, this suggests that planning processes with a strong "internal" as well as "market" analysis focus may improve the effective implementation of the resulting planned strategy content.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, what is the role of planning process design in aiding or hindering effective plan implementation? Conant and White (1999) find that marketing planning processes that develop a clear sense of the firm's marketing strengths and weaknesses are connected with greater follow through on marketing program plans. Coupled with our results concerning the role of marketing capabilities, this suggests that planning processes with a strong "internal" as well as "market" analysis focus may improve the effective implementation of the resulting planned strategy content.…”
Section: Limitations and Directions For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One stream adopts an individual-level perspective and focuses on factors affecting managers' commitment to strategic marketing decisions (e.g., Noble and Mokwa 1999;Rosier et al 2010). A second stream adopts a marketing program-level perspective and focuses on factors affecting the link between marketing program planning and execution and performance outcomes (e.g., Bonoma 1985;Conant and White 1999). A third perspective adopts a "strategic fit" approach and examines the extent to which alignment between planned strategy content and supporting organizational structures and cultures explains variance in firm performance (e.g., Olson et al 2005;Vorhies and Morgan 2003;Yarbrough et al 2011).…”
Section: Theory Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonfinancial benefits include a better understanding of customer needs and the identification of new opportunities (Conant and White, 1999). Although some researchers have suggested that more formal planning is associated with better performance (Claycomb, Germain and Dröge, 2000), other researchers have emphasised the need to adopt a planning approach that is adaptable to the organisation culture and the business environment (Smith, 2003).…”
Section: The Academic Perspective On Key Account Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participation in planning is 6 a key indicator of its effectiveness (Phillips, Davies and Moutinho, 2001), although gaining buy-in is difficult (Lane and Clewes, 2000). Gaining internal buy-in is critical in key account planning, and it is common to hear key account managers say they do more selling internally than in front of the customer.More recently, another stream of research has indicated that there are both financial and nonfinancial benefits to strategic marketing planning (Conant and White, 1999). The nonfinancial benefits include a better understanding of customer needs and the identification of new opportunities (Conant and White, 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation