2020
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhaa101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marketplace Lending, Information Aggregation, and Liquidity

Abstract: Lending marketplaces aimed at directly connecting retail lenders and borrowers retreat from auctions and, instead, set prices and allocate credit on their own, despite evidence that retail investors possess valuable soft and nonstandard information. We investigate this puzzle by analyzing a unique data set of 7,455 auctions and 34 million bids from a leading British peer-to-business platform. We find that the platform was vulnerable to liquidity shocks, resulting in sizable deviations from information efficien… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our article is closest to Zhu (2019), in that we both use rich micro-level data to evaluate the economic consequences of changes in the availability of nontraditional data. Finally, our research is related to recent studies examining innovations in financial markets more broadly (Berg, Burgand, Puri, andGombović (2020), Franks, Serrano-Velarde, andSussman (2020), and Grennan and Musto (2020)) and retail investors' experiences with such innovation (Célérier andVallée (2017), Farrell, Green, Jame, andMarkov (2019), and Vallée and Zeng (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Our article is closest to Zhu (2019), in that we both use rich micro-level data to evaluate the economic consequences of changes in the availability of nontraditional data. Finally, our research is related to recent studies examining innovations in financial markets more broadly (Berg, Burgand, Puri, andGombović (2020), Franks, Serrano-Velarde, andSussman (2020), and Grennan and Musto (2020)) and retail investors' experiences with such innovation (Célérier andVallée (2017), Farrell, Green, Jame, andMarkov (2019), and Vallée and Zeng (2019)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…So, P2P lending can be said to be a financing model, namely a multi-sided platform that can facilitate financial institutions and small investors to fund startups and small businesses. P2P platforms have brought together individual investors with small business firms, and usually offer credit on a variety of systems other than the interest system [43,44].…”
Section: Literature Review 21 Fintech and P2p Lendingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reputation of P2P platforms in relation to credit risk assessment, together with the informal network of relationships among companies, can determine the ability of these companies to obtain P2P loans from a wide range of investors. Thus, active P2P platforms in the SME credit market act as intermediaries between investors (small investors and financial institutions) and firms, providing a wide variety of services such as credit screening (Wei and Lin 2017 ; Franks et al 2021 ). There are indirect network externalities between small investors and financial institutions.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, P2P lending platforms act as intermediaries between lenders and borrowers. They facilitate exchanges through credit screening services, posted interest rates (Wei and Lin 2017 ; Franks et al 2021 ), default prediction (Franks et al 2016 ), and formal and informal lending procedures (Allen et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%