Marking Boundaries: Culture as Category Work

Abstract

Contemporary social science is acutely aware of what happens when we mark or police boundaries. Cross-cultural research highlights such issues. Face-to-face interviews and e-mail exchanges with Asian businessmen appeared to suggest clear boundaries between Tanzanian African and Asian “culture.” However, such ready understanding raises two further issues. First, boundary marking might fit with a colonial methodology used by the early anthropologists to fix a boundary around “native” populations. Second, the very concepts of “culture” and “identity” need deconstruction. Using Sacks’s insistence on the inescapably local and self-constituting character of social interaction, the authors examine what is involved when ethnographers (and laypersons) use categories to describe the world. They conclude with an assessment of what remains of anthropology’s and sociology’s concept of culture given their tendency to fudge the boundary between the descriptive abilities of lay and sociological members.

The boundary of sustainability reporting: evidence from the FTSE100

“…GSK and AstraZeneca's discussion of inhaler propellants as ozone depleting substances (EN20). As such this relates to ascriptive bounding rather than reciprocal bounding (Ryen and Silverman, 2000) associated with stakeholder engagement.…”

“…None of the seven FTSE100 mining companies reported on emissions of ozonedepleting substance, despite EU endorsement of the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol, which outlined a global phase-down of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) (subsequently ratified on 27/9/18). In contrast the pharma group, AstraZeneca provided a good example of proactive ascriptive bounding (Ryen and Silverman, 2000) with regards to this impending legislation:…”

Fighting the Crocodiles: Immigrant Students and Their Perilous Routes at Campus

“…I ask, "What do you want your text to do?" Texts have the capacity to change, transform (Bauman, 2005;Denzin & Lincoln, 2008;Skeggs, 2010;Smith, 2005), and kindle a spark-talk is action (Atkinson & Coffey, 2002;Holstein & Gubrium, 2005;Peräkylä, 2005;Ryen & Silverman, 2000). With repetition and citation only, there will be nothing new.…”

Close encounters of the ‘CA’ kind: a review of literature analysing talk in research interviews

“…Other articles investigating data drawn from research interviews include Have (1985Have ( , 2004, Mazeland and Have (1998), Rapley (2001Rapley ( , 2004, Rapley and Antaki (1998) and Ryen and Silverman (2000). Later, I consider each in more detail.…”

“…Later, I consider each in more detail. Ryen and Silverman (2000) use MCA to analyse ethnographic data from a cross-cultural study (face-to-face interviews and email exchanges). The central question for these researchers is how far is 'culture reducible to a member's category?'…”