The Bioarchaeology of the Human HeadDecapitation, Decoration, and Deformation 2011
DOI: 10.5744/florida/9780813035567.003.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Marking Ethnicity Through Premortem Cranial Modification Among the Pre-Inca Chiribaya, Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They argue that the patterns of homogeneity they find internal to cemeteries in the Omo M10 cemetery complex in Peru's Moquegua Valley contrasts with heterogeneity between cemeteries and "represents clusters of kin groups or ayllus whose composition changed over time" (1995:161). We also see this perspective in more recent publications such as Lozada's (2011) work involving Chiribaya skeletal samples where she focuses on the social import of head shaping as a sign of ethnicity, as reflected in economic activity for these groups. Interesting recent treatments include Prieto et al (2019) work on a mass child sacrifice in the Moche Valley where cranial modification is used together with other indicators to argue for the multiethnic origin of these children.…”
Section: Social Identitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…They argue that the patterns of homogeneity they find internal to cemeteries in the Omo M10 cemetery complex in Peru's Moquegua Valley contrasts with heterogeneity between cemeteries and "represents clusters of kin groups or ayllus whose composition changed over time" (1995:161). We also see this perspective in more recent publications such as Lozada's (2011) work involving Chiribaya skeletal samples where she focuses on the social import of head shaping as a sign of ethnicity, as reflected in economic activity for these groups. Interesting recent treatments include Prieto et al (2019) work on a mass child sacrifice in the Moche Valley where cranial modification is used together with other indicators to argue for the multiethnic origin of these children.…”
Section: Social Identitymentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to the type of device used, the age at which it was affixed and the duration of its application are two other factors that may explain variation among the shapes of artificially modified crania (Tiesler, ; Tiesler & Cucina, ). The cultural etiology of ACM are multiple including esthetics (e.g., Dingwall, ), religious (e.g., Fletcher, Pearson, & Ambers, ; Houston, ; Tiesler & Cucina, ), the statement of a social status (e.g., Geller, ; Khudaverdyan, ; Okumura, ; Sharapova & Razhev, ) and ethnic identity (e.g., Blom, ; Hakenbeck, ; Lozada, ; Mayall, Pilbrow, & Bitadze, ; Ozbek, ; Tiesler, ; Torres‐Rouff, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%