2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2014.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov chain based computational visual attention model that learns from eye tracking data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we used novel data-mining methods that encapsulate the highly dynamic and individualistic spatiotemporal nature of gaze. Although a few previous studies have used Markov-based analysis with eyetracking data to identify fixations and saccades (Salvucci & Goldberg, 2000), to infer observers' tasks (Haji-Abolhassani & Clark, 2014;Simola et al, 2008), or to build visual saliency models (Zhong, Zhao, Zou, Wang, & Wang, 2014), only a small number of recent studies have applied these techniques to face exploration (Chuk et al, 2014;Kanan et al, 2015). This approach is particularly powerful as faces feature very clear and stable ROIs (eyes, mouth, nose), allowing meaningful comparisons of Markov model states across stimuli and observers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we used novel data-mining methods that encapsulate the highly dynamic and individualistic spatiotemporal nature of gaze. Although a few previous studies have used Markov-based analysis with eyetracking data to identify fixations and saccades (Salvucci & Goldberg, 2000), to infer observers' tasks (Haji-Abolhassani & Clark, 2014;Simola et al, 2008), or to build visual saliency models (Zhong, Zhao, Zou, Wang, & Wang, 2014), only a small number of recent studies have applied these techniques to face exploration (Chuk et al, 2014;Kanan et al, 2015). This approach is particularly powerful as faces feature very clear and stable ROIs (eyes, mouth, nose), allowing meaningful comparisons of Markov model states across stimuli and observers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to study the cognitive aspect of the Human Visual System, one of the common approaches is to build a mathematical model that sufficiently represents the system (Simola et al, 2008;Zhong et al, 2014). Among the most appropriate is the NN model, which is a simplified brain model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Determine whether all of the features channel have already been selected, and if so, turn (5), otherwise, select the task targets of key features queue the next major key corresponding channel, turn (4). (4) Calculate the activity diagram, with the previously calculated features channel activity diagram together to weight and generate saliency map (where the weighting coefficient by the task targets and interference target feature data on this feature difference normalized results are given), turn (2); (5) Not hit the target, the algorithm fails; (6) Hit the target, task is completed.…”
Section: Extracting Visual Attention Features Of Knownmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhong use the transition probability SVR prediction Markov chain of eye tracking data to estimate generating the saliency map by the stationary distribution of Markov chain [4]. Mahadevan is use of bottom-up center-surround salient information, the feature selection of feature-based attention and top-down saliency of target detection to track the salient target [5].Han extract the object bank and other features of the input image and calculating entropy to guide image classification tasks [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%