2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00262-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov chain models for vegetation dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
118
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…A Markov chain is a stochastic process (based on probabilities) with discrete state space and discrete or continuous parameter space [18]. In this random process, the state of a system s at time (t+1) depends only on the state of the system at time t, not on the previous states.…”
Section: Stochastic Markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Markov chain is a stochastic process (based on probabilities) with discrete state space and discrete or continuous parameter space [18]. In this random process, the state of a system s at time (t+1) depends only on the state of the system at time t, not on the previous states.…”
Section: Stochastic Markov Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have demonstrated plant spatialpattern formation as a result of different process using different kind of models, ranging from analytical models (HilleRisLambers et al, 2001), Markov chains (Balzter, 2000;Logofet and Lesnaya, 2000), cellular automata (Bak et al, 1988;Solé and Manrubia, 1995). All these models are limited by the fact that they can not include all the variability of the system into the model (Whilhelm and Brüggemann, 2000).…”
Section: Fractal Dimension Of Plant Spatial Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the limitations of individual model are also discussed in many studies (Araya & Cabral, 2010;Balzter, 2000;Triantakonstantis & Mountrakis, 2012). Therefore, the integrated modeling approaches are widely used for LULC change simulation and projection to overcome the limitations of individual models (Al-Sharif & Pradhan, 2015;Basse, Omrani, Charif, Gerber, & Bódis, 2014;Guan et al, 2011;Mishra, Rai, & Mohan, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%