2021
DOI: 10.1080/09296174.2021.1877004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Models for Multi-state Language Change

Abstract: Historical linguistics has witnessed an upsurge in quantitative corpus studies. The bulk of these studies involve the use of regression modelling. We point out a number of potential problems with this approach, and offer an alternative. For a multi-state language change, we propose a Markov model in continuous time. The major advantage of this technique, which has been used in medical contexts, is that it is especially geared towards dealing with time as a variable of interest, while it still allows one to loo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the assumption of unidirectionality has two drawbacks. First, the trajectory of change may not always be entirely straightforward or unidirectional; rather, variation can be pervasive and functional, oscillating throughout history (Norde, 2009;Van de Velde & De Smet, 2021: 3), and a synchronic snapshot may prove misleading if it has been captured at an oscillating moment (Van de Velde, 2017). Second, even if grammaticalization can more often than not be assumed to be unidirectional, not all instances of grammatical change constitute cases of grammaticalization, and these other types of changes are not necessarily unidirectional (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the assumption of unidirectionality has two drawbacks. First, the trajectory of change may not always be entirely straightforward or unidirectional; rather, variation can be pervasive and functional, oscillating throughout history (Norde, 2009;Van de Velde & De Smet, 2021: 3), and a synchronic snapshot may prove misleading if it has been captured at an oscillating moment (Van de Velde, 2017). Second, even if grammaticalization can more often than not be assumed to be unidirectional, not all instances of grammatical change constitute cases of grammaticalization, and these other types of changes are not necessarily unidirectional (cf.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%