2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2785280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Prediction Model for Host Load Detection and VM Placement in Live Migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed migration method does not include a task size determination algorithm for predicting the migration time by analyzing the available resources of the source or the GPU usage patterns of VMs to send an appropriately sized task to the destination node. These limitations can be mitigated by adopting advanced forecast‐based monitoring techniques in existing cloud environments. If the size of clusters constituting a cloud system increases due to an extension of physical nodes, the monitoring overhead will also increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed migration method does not include a task size determination algorithm for predicting the migration time by analyzing the available resources of the source or the GPU usage patterns of VMs to send an appropriately sized task to the destination node. These limitations can be mitigated by adopting advanced forecast‐based monitoring techniques in existing cloud environments. If the size of clusters constituting a cloud system increases due to an extension of physical nodes, the monitoring overhead will also increase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Aroca et al [28] performed competitive ratio analysis on approximate solutions for the VM placement issue with restrictions on the number of VMs and PMs. Melhem et al [29] proposed a Markov prediction model for VM placement in live VM migration to determine the set of candidate destination hosts that would be able to receive the migrated VMs in a way that avoids their VM migration in the near future. However, they did not consider how to determine the under-loaded, over-loaded, or normal loaded status, which is also important for VM consolidation.…”
Section: Vm Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their previous study, Melhen et al suggested a method for identifying underloaded and overloaded PMs using Markov chains. The current state of PMs is determined by comparing the CPU utilization with upper and lower thresholds; the future load is predicted using the proposed Markov chain.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%