2010
DOI: 10.1515/9783110250114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Processes, Semigroups and Generators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
251
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
251
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…which is the Duhamel expansion giving (see [11], page 52) the solution to ∂ ∂t f = (A + L)f and this concludes the proof. 3.4.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 58%
“…which is the Duhamel expansion giving (see [11], page 52) the solution to ∂ ∂t f = (A + L)f and this concludes the proof. 3.4.…”
Section: 3supporting
confidence: 58%
“…The convergence of the chains in distribution follows from the convergence of transition operators by a well known general result, see e.g. (Kallenberg, 2002), or (Kolokoltsov, 2011). Moreover, weak convergence of random variables to a constant implies their convergence in probability.…”
Section: Auxiliary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These class of models is often referred to as mean-field games. Related equilibrium concept was called the Nash certainty equivalence principle, see (Lasry & Lions, 2006;Achdou & Capuzzo-Dolcetta, 2010;Gomes, Mohr, & Souza, 2010;Huang, Caines, & Malhamé, 2003;Huang, Malhamé, & Caines, 2006;Huang, 2010;Kolokoltsov, Li, & Yang, 2011) and references therein. Unlike our centralized setting above, analysis of these models does not lead to the control of distributions in the limit, but rather to certain consistency condition on homogeneous individual controls (Nash certainty equivalence).…”
Section: Conclusion and Bibliographical Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation (27) defines an integral operator with a positive stochastic kernel, which, taking into account assumption (26), is in fact a probability kernel. Hence this operator extends naturally to a positivity preserving conservative contraction in B(R) (68)), so that…”
Section: Duality For F Depending On the Difference Of Its Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%