2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cviu.2013.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov Random Field modeling, inference & learning in computer vision & image understanding: A survey

Abstract: In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of Markov Random Fields (MRFs) in computer vision and image understanding, with respect to the modeling, the inference and the learning. While MRFs were introduced into the computer vision eld about two decades ago, they started to become a ubiquitous tool for solving visual perception problems around the turn of the millennium following the emergence of efficient inference methods. During the past decade, a variety of MRF models as well as inference and learnin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
148
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
(316 reference statements)
0
148
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The complete correctness of the MLP-MRF results at the non-positive regions are not guaranteed, but one thing is certain: the corresponding MLP-MRF results are much more accurate than those of the CNN. In fact, while the CNN accurately classifies the interiors of objects with spatial feature representations, the MLP-MRF could provide a smooth, but also crisp boundary segmentation with high fidelity [56]. These supplementary characteristics inherent in the MLP-MRF and CNN, are captured well by the proposed VPRS-based MRF-CNN regional decision fusion approach.…”
Section: The Vprs Based Mrf-cnn Fusion Decisionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The complete correctness of the MLP-MRF results at the non-positive regions are not guaranteed, but one thing is certain: the corresponding MLP-MRF results are much more accurate than those of the CNN. In fact, while the CNN accurately classifies the interiors of objects with spatial feature representations, the MLP-MRF could provide a smooth, but also crisp boundary segmentation with high fidelity [56]. These supplementary characteristics inherent in the MLP-MRF and CNN, are captured well by the proposed VPRS-based MRF-CNN regional decision fusion approach.…”
Section: The Vprs Based Mrf-cnn Fusion Decisionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…That is, the MLP-MRF depends primarily on the spectral feature differentiation from the MLP with consideration of its spatial connectivity/smoothness [56]. Such characteristics result in similar classification performance to the result of MLP but with less salt and pepper effect.…”
Section: A Characteristics Of Mlp-mrf Classificationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Each node represents a random variable, and the edges represent probabilistic relationships among variables. Models which are comprised of directed edges are known as Bayesian networks, whilst models that are composed of undirected edges are known as Markov Random Fields (MRF) [12]. In this paper, we present an inference approach under the hypothesis of MRF, modeled by means of Factor Graphs.…”
Section: Bayesian Inference Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph-based representations were introduced in computer vision at mid-eighties [2] through Markov Random Fields as a novel mathematical modeling framework constrained though from the lack of efficient inference methods as well as processing power -and became again popular during the past two decades thanks to the development of efficient optimization algorithms [3,4].…”
Section: Inference On Graphical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%