2020
DOI: 10.1090/tran/8181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov random walks on homogeneous spaces and Diophantine approximation on fractals

Abstract: In the first part, using the recent measure classification results of Eskin–Lindenstrauss, we give a criterion to ensure a.s. equidistribution of empirical measures of an i.i.d. random walk on a homogeneous space G / Γ G/\Gamma . Employing renewal and joint equidistribution arguments, this result is generalized in the second part to random walks with Markovian dependence. Finally, following a strategy of Simmons–Weiss, we apply these results to Diophanti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If Γ µ has Zariski dense image in Ad(H), then it is proved in [8] that the orbit closure Γ + µ x is a homogeneous subspace of X inside which the random walk equidistributes. Our next result is a generalization of this and other rigidity results for the random trajectory of points proved in [8,75,89].…”
Section: Orbit Closures and Equidistributionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If Γ µ has Zariski dense image in Ad(H), then it is proved in [8] that the orbit closure Γ + µ x is a homogeneous subspace of X inside which the random walk equidistributes. Our next result is a generalization of this and other rigidity results for the random trajectory of points proved in [8,75,89].…”
Section: Orbit Closures and Equidistributionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…For unipotent random walks, recurrence is not always guaranteed [17, §10.2.1]. On the other hand, in the particular case of measures on parabolic subgroups, slightly weaker expansion properties were first used in the work of Simmons-Weiss [89] and subsequently in [75] to prove measure rigidity and equidistribution results in a setting corresponding to the case H = G in our framework. See also Remark 1.3. We next introduce the terminology necessary to state our main results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following is a consequence of the above proof regarding positivity of the constant Λ based on the Markov property (see e.g. [35,59] for similar uses of this idea in close contexts). The hypotheses of this proposition are a little awkward but are satisfied in many cases: • (Furstenberg [32]) H = SL d (R) and the ρ(Γ) is a strongly irreducible and nonrelatively compact, • (Guivarc'h [44]) the image of Γ is non-amenable and has at most exponential | • |growth (see more precisely Kaimanovich-Kapovich-Schupp [47, Proposition 2.5]), • (Maher-Tiozzo [53]) the group Γ acts non-elementarily on a geodesic Gromov-hyperbolic space.…”
Section: Law Of Large Numbers For Subadditive Functionsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Now fix an edge (v 0 , v 1 ) in the maximal component B and consider the induced (renewal) measure ν on Γ obtained by return times the vertices v 0 and v 1 consecutively (see e.g. [59,Definition 3.4]). Then, by the Markov property, the induced law on Γ N of this Markovian random walk along the return times to (v 0 , v 1 ) is the Bernoulli law ν N on Γ N (see e.g.…”
Section: Law Of Large Numbers For Subadditive Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation