2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2004.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markov switching regimes in a monetary exchange rate model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not take logarithm for interest rate variables because they are in the form of percentage already. Note that, in Frommel, MacDonald, and Menkhoff [5], the variation is evaluated at annual change instead of monthly change.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do not take logarithm for interest rate variables because they are in the form of percentage already. Note that, in Frommel, MacDonald, and Menkhoff [5], the variation is evaluated at annual change instead of monthly change.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies relate exchange rates and macroeconomic fundamentals in a MS context (see e.g. Marsh (2000), Bessec (2003), Sarno et al (2004) or Frömmel et al (2005)) or analyze spot and forward exchange rates comovements (see e.g. Clarida et al (2003)).…”
Section: Markov Switching Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the mean squared error criterion, the Markov Model did not produce superior forecasts to the RW. Frommel, Macdonald and Menkhoff (2005) used the real interest rate differential (RID) model which is an extended version of the Frankel-Bilson model by introducing Markov regime switches for three industrialized countries currencies (Germany, United Kingdom, Japan) relative to the United States dollar. They found the evidence of the relationship between exchange rates and the fundamentals.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%