2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2010.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markovian agent modeling swarm intelligence algorithms in wireless sensor networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a similar manner pheromone gradients have been adapted in the WSN literature as an abstract means of studying the evolution of routes from source to sink nodes. Several models have been built to investigate the spread of pheromone in such networks [Bruneo et al 2012;Guenther et al 2013]. We show how to capture those models in PALOMA.…”
Section: A Wireless Sensor Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar manner pheromone gradients have been adapted in the WSN literature as an abstract means of studying the evolution of routes from source to sink nodes. Several models have been built to investigate the spread of pheromone in such networks [Bruneo et al 2012;Guenther et al 2013]. We show how to capture those models in PALOMA.…”
Section: A Wireless Sensor Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, accurate models to estimate a system's performance are largely missing. Some exceptions model the Collection Tree Protocol (CTP) [6] to improve its performance in industrial scenarios [12], analyze swarm intelligence algorithms for sensor networks based on the Markovian agent model [10], apply diffusion approximation techniques to estimate the end-to-end packet travel times assuming opportunistic packet forwarding rules [29], or model generic multi-hop functionality through population continuoustime Markov chains [8]. Nevertheless, the validation of these models is limited to numerical simulations, which lack precisely those real-world dynamics of low-power wireless links that make accurate protocol modeling so complex and difficult.…”
Section: B Link-based Transmissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, existing models often stop at the link layer, achieving model errors in the range of 2-7% [9]. Only a few attempts exist to model also higher-layer functionality [8], [10]- [12]. However, their validation is limited to numerical simulations, lacking precisely those real-world dynamics that complicate the modeling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several case studies [2][3][4] demonstrated that this is a powerful and useful framework. However the model specification is in terms of matrices which capture the possible interactions and influences between agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%