2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmacro.2012.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Markups and fiscal transmission in a panel of OECD countries

Abstract: This paper studies the role of the markup of price over marginal cost for the transmission of …scal policy shocks. We construct time series of markups allowing for ‡uctuations in capacity utilization and total factor productivity and use an aggregate production function that is more general than Cobb-Douglas. Including the constructed markup series in a panel vector autoregression with annual OECD data, we …nd that a positive shock to government spending substantially lowers markups while raising output, consu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By employing a forward orthogonal deviations transformation so as to eliminate time-invariant individual fixed effects, lagged level variables can be thus used as instruments in GMM estimations (Love and Zicchino, 2006). However, GMM and extended GMM estimators are designed for the case of a large cross-sectional dimension ( N ) relative to the time dimension ( T ) and have been shown to perform poorly when T → ∞ and particularly when the ratio of the variance of the individual effects to the variance of the innovations increases (Juessen and Linnemann, 2012).…”
Section: Methodology: the Pchvar Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By employing a forward orthogonal deviations transformation so as to eliminate time-invariant individual fixed effects, lagged level variables can be thus used as instruments in GMM estimations (Love and Zicchino, 2006). However, GMM and extended GMM estimators are designed for the case of a large cross-sectional dimension ( N ) relative to the time dimension ( T ) and have been shown to perform poorly when T → ∞ and particularly when the ratio of the variance of the individual effects to the variance of the innovations increases (Juessen and Linnemann, 2012).…”
Section: Methodology: the Pchvar Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the sizes of the cross-sectional dimension N and the time dimension T of our panel data (N = 18 and T = 34), to remove the short-T dynamic panel data bias or the so-called Nickell (1981) bias, we employ the bias-corrected fixed-effects estimator developed by Hahn and Kuersteiner (2002). For example, Juessen and Linnemann (2012) applied this bias-correction in panel VAR frameworks.…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martins and Scarpetta [2002] use a di¤erent approach, closer to Industrial Organization (IO), but reach similar conclusions for a sample of industries in G5 countries. More recently, Juessen and Linnemann [2012] provide evidence of counter-cyclical markups for a panel of 19 OECD countries; Afonso and Costa [2013] …nd that markups are counter-cyclical with …scal shocks for 6 out of 14 OECD countries and procyclical for 4 of them; Nekarda and Ramey [2013] …nd either acyclic or pro-cyclical markups with demand shocks for US industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%